My reading of this is that these features are illegal, period. Rogue AP
detection is one thing, and disabling them via network or
administrative (ie. eject the guest) means would be fine, but
interfering with the wireless is not acceptable per the FCC regulations.
Seems like common sense to me.
On 10/3/14 3:44 PM, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
On 10/03/14 17:34, Michael Van Norman wrote:
My reading of this is that these features are illegal, period. Rogue
AP
detection is one thing, and disabling them via network or
administrative (ie. eject the guest) means would be fine
IANAL, but I believe they are. State laws may also apply (e.g. California
Code - Section 502). In California, it is illegal to knowingly and
without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services
or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user
of a
On 10/3/14 7:25 PM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote:
On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu
wrote:
IANAL, but I believe they are. State laws may also apply (e.g.
California
Code - Section 502). In California, it is illegal to knowingly and
without permission
One of the reasons I pointed to the California law is that it covers above
L1 even if FCC authority does not. The state law also provides for
criminal penalties. I do not know if other states have similar laws.
/Mike
On 10/3/14 7:42 PM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote:
On Fri 2014-Oct-03
5 matches
Mail list logo
