* Forrest Christian (List Account) [2020-10-08 11:39]:
> I've done a bit of googling and am either finding stuff that is largely
> Cisco-specific or which is generic - all of which I'm rather familiar with
> based on my past history. Is there anything I should worry about which is
>
* David Hubbard [2018-05-16 19:01]:
> I’m curious if anyone who’s used 3356 for transit has found
> shortcomings in how their peering and redundancy is configured, or
>From a recent experience I can tell you that a change request to
change a peering from "full
* Ronald F. Guilmette [2017-08-02 09:37]:
>
> The annotations in the RIPE WHOIS record for AS202746 seem pretty clear to me.
> This thing is B-O-G-U-S!
You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you
express your points in a less emotional and aggressive
* Tore Anderson t...@fud.no [2015-06-12 11:12]:
I see tons of bogus routes show up with AS4788 in the path, and at
least AS3549 is acceping them.
E.g. for the RIPE NCC (193.0.0.0/21):
[BGP/170] 00:20:29, MED 1000, localpref 150
AS path: 3549 4788
* Job Snijders j...@instituut.net [2015-06-12 13:30]:
Yes, I suspect tons of 3356 / 3549 customers shut down their BGP
sessions waiting for the storm to blow over. I expect more churn then
usual the next 6 ~ 12 hours, due to customers slowly turning session
back on.
Yes. It's nice and stable
* Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net [2015-06-12 12:57]:
On 12 Jun 2015, at 17:46, Job Snijders wrote:
OK, as of now (~ 10:40) UTC things look normalised.
Just got off the phone, I think things may be in hand, now.
Still seeing a lot more updates than usual:
Hello,
my resolver running on a dedicated server is warning about DNSSEC
validation failure for these two .gov domains 7 minutes after every
full hour:
Sep 26 13:07:04 alita unbound: [28931:0] info: validation failure
qatesttwai.gov. NS IN: no keys have a DS with algorithm
RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1
* Brielle Bruns br...@2mbit.com [2010-11-17 04:34]:
Hey All,
Sorry to bother the list, but I'm noticing that I've got no connectivity
to Hurricane Electric through GBLX from my Qwest DSL.
In this case, I'm trying to get to tunnelbroker.net:
...
3 184-99-65-41.boid.qwest.net
Hello Nanog,
I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
They want different Class C addresses, by which they mean IPs in
different /24 subnets.
The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from
different /24 higher then links from the same /24. So it's a
9 matches
Mail list logo