On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 08:13:09PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
>
> Level3 has been announcing 2x /9's as well as the /8 for some ti
? If I do a specific
> lookup for 4.0.0.0/8 it is there as well.
more-specific wins unless you specifically ask for all routes.
> Thanks,
> Hank
>
>> On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>>
>>> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announci
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 08:13:09PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
Level3 has been announcing 2x /9's as well as the /8 for some time now,
ever since Telefonica's unfortunate incident where they allowed a
custo
routeviews says the /9s have been announced for a while
the route object for 4.0.0.0/9 was last updated 20060203
On 9/20/11 10:13 , Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
>
> -Hank
>
Once upon a time, Hank Nussbacher said:
> Newbie question:
>
> If I do:
> route-views>sho ip bgp 4.0.0.0
> BGP routing table entry for 4.0.0.0/9, version 821994
>
> why do I see the /9 and not the /8 by default? If I do a specific lookup
> for 4.0.0.0/8 it is there
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Newbie question:
If I do:
route-views>sho ip bgp 4.0.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 4.0.0.0/9, version 821994
why do I see the /9 and not the /8 by default? If I do a specific lookup
for 4.0.0.0/8 it is there as well.
Thanks,
Hank
On Sep
On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
I don't know if it was today, but I see two /9s.
--
TTFN,
patrick
Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
-Hank
8 matches
Mail list logo