Re: 91.201.64.0/22 hijacked?

2012-09-05 Thread Georgios Theodoridis
van Aart [mailto:jer...@mompl.net] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:39 PM To: NANOG list Subject: 91.201.64.0/22 hijacked? The below email exchange may be of interest to some of you. The practical upshot is that it appears "the 91.201.64.0/22 range was hijacked and should be included into the DROP

RE: 91.201.64.0/22 hijacked?

2012-09-04 Thread Schiller, Heather A
t: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:39 PM To: NANOG list Subject: 91.201.64.0/22 hijacked? The below email exchange may be of interest to some of you. The practical upshot is that it appears "the 91.201.64.0/22 range was hijacked and should be included into the DROP list". As an interesting

91.201.64.0/22 hijacked?

2012-08-31 Thread Jeroen van Aart
The below email exchange may be of interest to some of you. The practical upshot is that it appears "the 91.201.64.0/22 range was hijacked and should be included into the DROP list". As an interesting aside, quoting a friend: "the original company (that performed dangerous waste utilization) m