fine. I
>>> started doing traceroutes and they all were very odd, all not reaching
>>> their destination and some hopping all over creation before dying. But if I
>>> did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream
>>> (Bantel.net) had a
all not reaching their destination
>> and some hopping all over creation before dying. But if I did traceroute
>> with ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a
>> BGP issue? Bantel blamed Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm
>>
erything stopped working except for ICMP. I could ping everywhere
> just
> > > fine. I started doing traceroutes and they all were very odd, all not
> > > reaching their destination and some hopping all over creation before
> > > dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP
t
> > fine. I started doing traceroutes and they all were very odd, all not
> > reaching their destination and some hopping all over creation before
> > dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
> > indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue?
creation before
dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what kind of
problem would let ping work fine but not any of the other protocols. It
a
t if I did traceroute with
> ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP
> issue? Bantel blamed Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm
> wondering what kind of problem would let ping work fine but not any of the
> other protocols. It also see
l.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what kind of problem
would let ping work fine but not any of the other protocols. It also seems odd
that I could traceroute via UDP part way to a destination but then it would
fail if the prob
7 matches
Mail list logo
