Thanks guys!
Hi Jason,
if you have questions on Structr, just let me know, we're happy to help!
Best
Axel
Am 16.07.2014 23:31, schrieb Michael Hunger:
Right I agree with Tom, currently you get this in structr (even when
importing Neo4j databases, e.g. from a GraphGist).
It definitely makes
Hi Jason,
From your examples, you should look at the Assimilation Project!
http://assimilationsystems.com/
http://assimproj.org/
This is exactly the kind of data modeling we're doing - together with
automating the collection of the data and keeping it up to date. It's a
very interest
Right I agree with Tom, currently you get this in structr (even when importing
Neo4j databases, e.g. from a GraphGist).
It definitely makes sense to have a feature like that.
For Neo4j this is on the roadmap too, but not in the immediate future, it's
more a capacity issue :)
Am 16.07.2014 um 2
sounds like structr.org may be something you want to look at ..
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards
Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt
van der Waalsstraat 30
6706 JR Wageningen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06
Phone: +31 3 17 84 22 17
E-mail: t.zeppenfe...@ophileon.com
Web: www.ophileon.co
I was just wondering if the ability to utilize a schema of sorts was on the
road map.
When I say schema, I'm thinking more along the lines of relational
constraints.
Let's use the following simple example.
We have the following types of entities represented by node labels
(:`Server`)
(:`Switch
