On 12-10-04 04:31 AM, Nick wrote:
...or you could just use Frank's pages, which are wonderful, and free!
I often use those also. The Data from the TCA is actually a scan of the
entire registration file from the RMA, RTMA, EIA, JEDEC and a few other
names that the used over the years. each f
Probably not as vulnerable as single sideband. :S
Are you sure that it is the multiplexed nixies and not the switching
supply? I'm just curious at this point, I've always assumed that the
rapid ionization/de-ionization of the neon would create some RF noise,
but no real idea. When I built my W
On 12-10-03 07:06 PM, Adam Jacobs wrote:
Somehow I missed the part where they're full power on the 6m band and
partial power on 2m. Sounds like some nice finals to me.
My handy reference on tubes is from the tube collectors association (one
of the best 50 bucks spent on information) and includ
Somehow I missed the part where they're full power on the 6m band and
partial power on 2m. Sounds like some nice finals to me.
-Adam W7QI
On 10/3/2012 4:05 PM, Adam Jacobs wrote:
WOW! Who's complaining? Build yourself a nice little CW transceiver or
linear amplifier.
Those old power pentodes
WOW! Who's complaining? Build yourself a nice little CW transceiver or
linear amplifier.
Those old power pentodes are getting scarce. :(
-Adam
On 10/3/2012 1:50 PM, Charles MacDonald wrote:
On 12-10-03 11:30 AM, jb-electronics wrote:
About 10 years ago I bough two NIB 7094s for about USD 5 !
On 12-10-03 11:30 AM, jb-electronics wrote:
About 10 years ago I bough two NIB 7094s for about USD 5 !
Unfortunately, they were RCA 7094s - RF power output pentodes!
Released by RCA Jan 20, 1958 Heater 3.2 amps (later 2.85) at 6.3 Volts.
DC plate volts 1500 Continuous service, 2000 intermit
Happened to me, too! But I made sure to have the seller send me a
picture beforehand and so I did not purchase it in the end.
Jens
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 10:38:35 UTC+1, Jens Boos wrote:
I wouldn't say they are totally useless. Mostly, yes. But
sometimes you can achieve nice res
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 10:38:35 UTC+1, Jens Boos wrote:
> I wouldn't say they are totally useless. Mostly, yes. But sometimes you
> can achieve nice results. Recently I got a new in box NL-7094 via one of
> those brokers. But that is after emailing hundreds of suppliers... ;-)
>
About 10
I wouldn't say they are totally useless. Mostly, yes. But sometimes you
can achieve nice results. Recently I got a new in box NL-7094 via one of
those brokers. But that is after emailing hundreds of suppliers... ;-)
Jens
Have you actually tried this one ? There are tons of so called part
bro
Have you actually tried this one ? There are tons of so called part brokers
on the web. Most are useless, even if you're a manufacturer. For hobbyist
they're especially useless.
I thought I had some, but they ended being UHP408 chips. The prefix does
suggest Sprague. Have you tried Allegro ? T
Hello!
try www.ctg123.com/rapid-quote-system/request/?p=*UHP480.
*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
neonixie-l+un
11 matches
Mail list logo
