On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:11:53PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20160226154046.ga1...@quark.internal.precedence.co.uk>,
> Patrick Welche wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> >> The assembly looks like junk and considering the
In article <20160226154046.ga1...@quark.internal.precedence.co.uk>,
Patrick Welche wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
>> The assembly looks like junk and considering the adresses, you have
>> tried to disassemble some memory on the stack. Is this a
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> The assembly looks like junk and considering the adresses, you have
> tried to disassemble some memory on the stack. Is this a 64-bit wfica
> binary?
This is from:
/usr/pkgsrc/distfiles/linuxx64-13.3.0.344519.tar.gz
> Either way, this
The assembly looks like junk and considering the adresses, you have
tried to disassemble some memory on the stack. Is this a 64-bit wfica
binary?
Either way, this seems to be a completely different case. How does the
backtrace look like?
2016-02-26 13:01 GMT+01:00 Patrick Welche
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:22:38AM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> I still recommend Receiver for HTML5 in this case.
>
> The dump looks like a mess and eventually gdb is unable to process
> this dump of a Linux binary on NetBSD correctly. It would be
> interesting to know what is mapped at 0xba90004d.
I still recommend Receiver for HTML5 in this case.
The dump looks like a mess and eventually gdb is unable to process
this dump of a Linux binary on NetBSD correctly. It would be
interesting to know what is mapped at 0xba90004d. You could break at
that adress (b *0xba90004d) and check with pmap.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:44:32PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> Why don´t you just use the Receiver for HTML5? With regard to your
> crash, do you have a backtrace handy?
Have a look at Jose's from earlier in this thread:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2016/02/03/msg017788.html
P
Why don´t you just use the Receiver for HTML5? With regard to your
crash, do you have a backtrace handy?
2016-02-25 14:03 GMT+01:00 Patrick Welche :
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:31:35PM +0100, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eric Haszlakiewicz
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:31:35PM +0100, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> > On 2/1/2016 3:51 PM, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>
>
> > Have you tried downloading a newer version of the client from Citrix's
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> On 2/1/2016 3:51 PM, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Have you tried downloading a newer version of the client from Citrix's site?
I have just tried the last version of citrix as you told me.
It solves the
10 matches
Mail list logo