On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:16:10AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> >>Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
> >Th
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:16:10AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
...
> The system hangs and does not recover (well, a few processes
> continue on the other processor for a few minutes before they
> too deadlock...)
>
> I am guessing this problem has been around for a while, but it
> is only triggered w
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
active use.
F
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
> >>>This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
> >>>active use.
> >>> From
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
active use.
From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem,
however.
Any id
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
active use.
From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem,
however.
Any id
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:16:30PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer
> >
> > igmp_timer_expire() uses spin_lock(&im->lock)
> > but this lock is also taken by other igmp timers,
> > so it should be changed to bh version
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer
>
> igmp_timer_expire() uses spin_lock(&im->lock)
> but this lock is also taken by other igmp timers,
> so it should be changed to bh version.
When you're in a timer BH is already disabled. So this patch
is redund
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer
>
> igmp_timer_expire() uses spin_lock(&im->lock)
> but this lock is also taken by other igmp timers,
> so it should be changed to bh version.
... but according to theory this doesn't matter.
I
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
> > This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
> > active use.
> > From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem,
> > however.
> >
> > Any ide
On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
> This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
> active use.
> From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem,
> however.
>
> Any ideas about what this could be? It seems to be reproducible every
> day or
> two
11 matches
Mail list logo
