Hi, Alexander
On 2017/12/23 0:32, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Hi, Alexander
>>
>> On 2017/12/22 0:29, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Yunsheng Lin
>>> wrote:
Hi, Alexander
On 2017/12/21 0:24, Alexan
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Hi, Alexander
>
> On 2017/12/22 0:29, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>> Hi, Alexander
>>>
>>> On 2017/12/21 0:24, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yunsheng Lin
>>
Hi, Alexander
On 2017/12/22 0:29, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Hi, Alexander
>>
>> On 2017/12/21 0:24, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yunsheng Lin
>>> wrote:
Hi, all
I have some doubt about NAPI_G
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Hi, Alexander
>
> On 2017/12/21 0:24, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>> Hi, all
>>> I have some doubt about NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic when
>>> analyzing the tcpv4 gro process:
>>>
>>>
Hi, Alexander
On 2017/12/21 0:24, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Hi, all
>> I have some doubt about NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic when
>> analyzing the tcpv4 gro process:
>>
>> Firstly we set NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic to 1 in dev_gro_recei
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Hi, all
> I have some doubt about NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic when
> analyzing the tcpv4 gro process:
>
> Firstly we set NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic to 1 in dev_gro_receive:
> https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc4/source/ne
Hi, all
I have some doubt about NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic when
analyzing the tcpv4 gro process:
Firstly we set NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic to 1 in dev_gro_receive:
https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc4/source/net/core/dev.c#L4838
And then in inet_gro_receive, we check the NA