Hello, John.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:38PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So just to clarify the discussion for my purposes and make sure I
> understood, per-cgroup CAP rules was not desired, and instead we
> should either utilize an existing cap (are there still objections to
> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:13:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > Delegation is an explicit operation and reflected in the ownership of
>> > the subdirectories and cgroup interface files in them. The
>> > subhierarchy containment
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:13:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Delegation is an explicit operation and reflected in the ownership of
> > the subdirectories and cgroup interface files in them. The
> > subhierarchy containment is achieved by requiring the user who's
> > trying to migra
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> How would one be granted the right to move processes around in one's
>> own subtree?
>
> Through expicit delegation - chowning of the directory and
> cgroup.procs file
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> How would one be granted the right to move processes around in one's
> own subtree?
Through expicit delegation - chowning of the directory and
cgroup.procs file.
> Are you imagining that, if you're in /a/b and you want to
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:36:51PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I really don't know. The cgroupfs interface is a bit unfortunate in
>> that it doesn't really express the constraints. To safely migrate a
>> task, ISTM you ought to
Hello, Serge.
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:00:11PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > I really don't know. The cgroupfs interface is a bit unfortunate in
> > that it doesn't really express the constraints. To safely migrate a
> > task, ISTM you ought to have some form of privilege over the task
> >
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:36:51PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I really don't know. The cgroupfs interface is a bit unfortunate in
> that it doesn't really express the constraints. To safely migrate a
> task, ISTM you ought to have some form of privilege over the task
> *and* some for
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:36:51PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:28 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:57 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:28 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:57 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:51:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wro
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:57 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:51:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I hate to say it, but I think I may see a pr
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:51:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> I hate to say it, but I think I may see a problem. Current
>>> developments are afoot to make cgroups d
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:51:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> > This patch adds logic to allows a process to migrate other tasks
>> > between cgroups if they have CAP_SYS_RESOUR
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:51:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > This patch adds logic to allows a process to migrate other tasks
> > between cgroups if they have CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
> >
> > In Android (where this feature originated), the Acti
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> This patch adds logic to allows a process to migrate other tasks
> between cgroups if they have CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
>
> In Android (where this feature originated), the ActivityManager tracks
> various application states (TOP_APP, FOREGROUND, BACKG
15 matches
Mail list logo