Subject: RE: [PATCH] ucc_geth.c, make PHY device optional.
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:42 +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joakim Tjernlund
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:52 AM
{snip}
OK, but then a new property in PHY node is needed which holds
the initial speed and duplex.
initial-phy-capacity = speed duplex ?
This should be useful for real PHYs too if, for instance, autoneg
isn't
working/supported/wanted.
Maybe it should be:
initial-phy-capacity = speed
How about separate autoneg to a property dumb-phy, which
indicates the
PHY/switch doesn't provide MII register interface.
Something like that I suppose. But don't call it dumb phy,
nor fake phy, nor anything similar -- there simply is _no_
phy. If the Linux code wants to pretend there is
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:32 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
How about separate autoneg to a property dumb-phy, which
indicates the
PHY/switch doesn't provide MII register interface.
Something like that I suppose. But don't call it dumb phy,
nor fake phy, nor anything similar -- there
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 16:22 +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:21 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Cc: linuxppc-dev Development; Netdev; Fleming Andy-afleming
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ucc_geth.c, make
-Original Message-
From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:20 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Cc: linuxppc-dev Development; Netdev; Fleming Andy-afleming
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ucc_geth.c, make PHY device optional.
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 16:22 +0800, Li