On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, [windows-1252] Bj=F8rn Magnhild=F8en wrote:
You're right about the entities; I should have stated at x, y, z, are
independent, classical Aristotelian entities.
> But isn't this where meaning is produced, contrary to eg. a tautology?
> So it would be to go to the source of mea
well, i don't know about the sciences taking a hit for art scenario.
Take Jackie Stevens' analysis of the biotech/PR/culture industry for
example.
http://rtmark.com/rockwell.html
And there are enough ongoing collabs between science-based industry and
art
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD003458.h
Where is the problem?
I think local languages are fine, there are millions of dying languages,
even the differences between people on the balkans are ok, civilisation,
that the STATE (or whatever chief) allows killing, butchering,
expulsions, is something COMPLETELY different.
H.
On Thu, 10 Mar
> Thirdly, I don't see this 'digital boom' that others have mentioned, nor do
> I see the jobs that it is preparing us for (Maya Texutre modeling?
> .ASP/XML/CSS/Perl Programmer? I suppose these are out there but most rely on
> skills taught at trade schools, DeVRY, or self-taught..) I think Trebor