> This would be good functionality to have. Since I haven't checked too
> deeply yet, how are you configuring the DHCP server to deliver the
> additional addresses? What DHCP option is used here?
>
The DHCPv6 server just puts the configured addresses (Option 5) into the
Identity Association IA (
Hi guys, network manager has been working well for me until yesterday we
had a power outrage. After booting the machine, the notification area
shrink to a about 2 mm wide 5 mm high semi-transparent icon on the task
bar. There is no more wireless on my machine, anybody knows how to handle
this?
--
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the release of NetworkManager 0.9.6, and
network-manager-applet 0.9.6.2. This release includes many IPv6 fixes,
IPv6 VPN support, cli enhancements, ADSL modem support, on-demand WiFi
scan support, Vala language bindings, customized dnsmasq local caching
nameserver conf
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 19:42 +0200, igel wrote:
> hey everyone,
> is this the right mailing list for support questions regarding
> networkmanager? I'll just assume this for now :]
>
> So I gave networkmanager a shot and am kinda stuck with my wireless. I
> can't get nm-applet to display the network
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 22:58 +0200, Henri Wahl wrote:
> Hi developers,
> If I want to deliver more than one IPv6 address to DHCPv6 clients (a
> global one and an ULA for example) NetworkManager only uses one of them.
> The funny thing is that dhclient being used directly accepts several
> address
hey everyone,
is this the right mailing list for support questions regarding
networkmanager? I'll just assume this for now :]
So I gave networkmanager a shot and am kinda stuck with my wireless. I
can't get nm-applet to display the networks in range, even when started
as root. Maybe I misunderstoo
Dear Aleksander:
Yes, we are internally discussing about this recently.
But you know, QMI is the private protocol of Qualcomm, does Qualcomm
agree to this development?
Is there any law risk about this?
Any more, how do you want us to sponsor this project? Can you
From: Nicolas Cavallari
This completely removes Ad-Hoc WPA-None support, as it is
not supported by the linux kernel since a long time,
have never been standardized and other vendors already
removed support for it since a long time. The security
of the protocol is also comparable to WEP, especial
From: Nicolas Cavallari
This completely removes Ad-Hoc WPA-None support, as it is
not supported by the linux kernel since a long time,
have never been standardized and other vendors already
removed support for it since a long time. The security
of the protocol is also comparable to WEP, especial
