Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Jonathan Blandford
Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not totally following the rationale why gtkrendercellprogressfoo is > better. Simply that it is (supposed) to look better embedded in menus? > Is that really a good enough reason for all of the code? It is supposed to look better for menus and treevi

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 14:49 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > > > Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There are a couple of other issues that you listed: > > > > > > >

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Jonathan Blandford
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > > Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There are a couple of other issues that you listed: > > > > > - Follows the system theme. The current Gtkcellrender thing > > > is not cor

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Robert Love
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: Hi, jrb. > Now for the rationale for using the cell progress bars. The primary > purpose of the cell renderer is to provide a progress bar suitable for > rendering in menus and lists. It is supposed to be 'flat', as opposed > to GtkPr

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are a couple of other issues that you listed: > > > - Follows the system theme. The current Gtkcellrender thing > > is not correctly themed. > > I'm not 100% sure what you mea

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-20 Thread Jonathan Blandford
Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As we all know, being stetic is of the utmost importance: > > http://primates.ximian.com/~peter/stetic.html > > The current NetworkManager applet is not as stetic as it deserves to be; > it has potential, it dreams of a world in which it is the mos

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 16:34 -0400, Robert Love wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Applied, thanks. Brian also suggested making the progress bars not as > > tall, so I've made them (ascent / 2). > > Thanks, Dan. > > Well, I would take a bullet (or at least some

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-16 Thread Robert Love
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > Applied, thanks. Brian also suggested making the progress bars not as > tall, so I've made them (ascent / 2). Thanks, Dan. Well, I would take a bullet (or at least some sort of blunt flying projectile) for my neighbor Brian, but I think t

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 13:34 -0400, Robert Love wrote: > As we all know, being stetic is of the utmost importance: > > http://primates.ximian.com/~peter/stetic.html > > The current NetworkManager applet is not as stetic as it deserves to be; > it has potential, it dreams of a world in which

Re: [patch] making the applet stetic.

2005-06-16 Thread Bryan Clark
> Compare yourself. Current applet: > > http://rlove.org/images/nm-applet-1.jpg > > On the road to being stetic applet: > > http://rlove.org/images/networkmanager-progress-bar-20050615.png > Nice. I like the rearranging of the secure icon. Peace, ~ Bryan ___