Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not totally following the rationale why gtkrendercellprogressfoo is
> better. Simply that it is (supposed) to look better embedded in menus?
> Is that really a good enough reason for all of the code?
It is supposed to look better for menus and treevi
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 14:49 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > > Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There are a couple of other issues that you listed:
> > >
> > > >
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are a couple of other issues that you listed:
> >
> > > - Follows the system theme. The current Gtkcellrender thing
> > > is not cor
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
Hi, jrb.
> Now for the rationale for using the cell progress bars. The primary
> purpose of the cell renderer is to provide a progress bar suitable for
> rendering in menus and lists. It is supposed to be 'flat', as opposed
> to GtkPr
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:37 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a couple of other issues that you listed:
>
> > - Follows the system theme. The current Gtkcellrender thing
> > is not correctly themed.
>
> I'm not 100% sure what you mea
Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As we all know, being stetic is of the utmost importance:
>
> http://primates.ximian.com/~peter/stetic.html
>
> The current NetworkManager applet is not as stetic as it deserves to be;
> it has potential, it dreams of a world in which it is the mos
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 16:34 -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Applied, thanks. Brian also suggested making the progress bars not as
> > tall, so I've made them (ascent / 2).
>
> Thanks, Dan.
>
> Well, I would take a bullet (or at least some
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> Applied, thanks. Brian also suggested making the progress bars not as
> tall, so I've made them (ascent / 2).
Thanks, Dan.
Well, I would take a bullet (or at least some sort of blunt flying
projectile) for my neighbor Brian, but I think t
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 13:34 -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> As we all know, being stetic is of the utmost importance:
>
> http://primates.ximian.com/~peter/stetic.html
>
> The current NetworkManager applet is not as stetic as it deserves to be;
> it has potential, it dreams of a world in which
> Compare yourself. Current applet:
>
> http://rlove.org/images/nm-applet-1.jpg
>
> On the road to being stetic applet:
>
> http://rlove.org/images/networkmanager-progress-bar-20050615.png
>
Nice. I like the rearranging of the secure icon.
Peace,
~ Bryan
___
10 matches
Mail list logo