Den 19. sep. 2012 07:47, skrev Aleksander Morgado:
On 09/18/2012 08:03 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
Btw, is this expected?:
model: '+CGMM: "MF820D"'
A bug, the handler code here probably needs to strip out the CGMM if
found. Most devices don't actually prefix the CGMM response with
"+CGMM" so the
>
> We need to run the power-down during init *only* after having checked
> current/modem capabilities. Will update the patch.
>
I pushed a new 'power-down-during-init' branch to the upstream git tree,
including the change of when the power down command is run, so that we
only run it after havi
>> >> I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
>> >> Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'm assuming the tests went well? :-)
>> >
>>
>> Except for the issue that CFUN+4 can occasionally take a long time
>> to finish :(
>
> How long?
>
> How long? I think the timeout is 3 seconds now so maybe it should be
> increased.
>
could be up to 30s, which is likely a firmware issue.
- Ben
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinf
On Sep 19, 2012 7:36 AM, "Ben Chan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Aleksander Morgado
> wrote:
> >
> >> I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
> >> Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
> >>
> >
> > I'm assuming the tests went well? :-)
> >
On 09/18/2012 08:03 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > Btw, is this expected?:
>> >
>> > model: '+CGMM: "MF820D"'
> A bug, the handler code here probably needs to strip out the CGMM if
> found. Most devices don't actually prefix the CGMM response with
> "+CGMM" so the code wasn't built to handle that,
>>
>>> I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
>>> Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
>>>
>>
>> I'm assuming the tests went well? :-)
>>
>
> Except for the issue that CFUN+4 can occasionally take a long time
> to finish :(
>
> Still haven't found t
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
>
>> I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
>> Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
>>
>
> I'm assuming the tests went well? :-)
>
Except for the issue that CFUN+4 can occasionally take a lo
> Hey Dan and Marius,
>
> >
> >> Power Up = enabled
> >> Power Down = disabled
> >>
> >> So we already have those states in ModemManager via the
> Enable() method
> >> and the modem states. It's just that not all devices
> a
> I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
> Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
>
I'm assuming the tests went well? :-)
> It may not be a bad idea to allow a plugin to override the
> power-down-on-initialization behavior.
>
Not a big deal I guess; gi
I briefly tested the patch on Samsung/Icera Y3300/Y3400 modems.
Planning to do some more stress tests later this week.
It may not be a bad idea to allow a plugin to override the
power-down-on-initialization behavior.
Thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Hey D
2012/9/18 Marius Kotsbak
> 2012/9/18 Aleksander Morgado
>
>> Hey Dan and Marius,
>>
>> >
>> >> Power Up = enabled
>> >> Power Down = disabled
>> >>
>> >> So we already have those states in ModemManager via the Enable() method
>> >> and the modem states. It's just that not all devices actually
>
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 19:45 +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> 2012/9/18 Aleksander Morgado
> Hey Dan and Marius,
>
> >
> >> Power Up = enabled
> >> Power Down = disabled
> >>
> >> So we already have those states in ModemManager via the
>
2012/9/18 Aleksander Morgado
> Hey Dan and Marius,
>
> >
> >> Power Up = enabled
> >> Power Down = disabled
> >>
> >> So we already have those states in ModemManager via the Enable() method
> >> and the modem states. It's just that not all devices actually implement
> >> the low-power mode when
14 matches
Mail list logo
