On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 04:44:00PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I tried the patch with the ClearCache call reverted and the behavior
> > seems equivalent to master. How about branch bg/dnsmasq-clear-cache-
> > option?
>
> LGTM
Merged, thanks.
Beniamino
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 23:20 +0100, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:10:21PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 20:23 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Haller on Tue, 2016/11/29 17:51:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue,
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 23:20 +0100, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> How about branch bg/dnsmasq-clear-cache-option?
Acked-By: Thomas Haller
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
networkmanager-list
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:10:21PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 20:23 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Thomas Haller on Tue, 2016/11/29 17:51:
> > > On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 15:03 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > > From: Christian Hesse
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 20:23 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Thomas Haller on Tue, 2016/11/29 17:51:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 15:03 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > From: Christian Hesse
> > >
> > > A new DNS may have different data for us. So tell dnsmasq
Thomas Haller on Tue, 2016/11/29 17:51:
> On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 15:03 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > From: Christian Hesse
> >
> > A new DNS may have different data for us. So tell dnsmasq to clear
> > the
> > cache when servers change.
>
> we currently
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 15:03 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> From: Christian Hesse
>
> A new DNS may have different data for us. So tell dnsmasq to clear
> the
> cache when servers change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse
> ---
> src/dns/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c | 1 +
>
From: Christian Hesse
A new DNS may have different data for us. So tell dnsmasq to clear the
cache when servers change.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse
---
src/dns/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/dns/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What is the
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
With 0.7 we need to rethink the caching
Derek Atkins wrote:
Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
Use bind with dbus turned on and it
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:36 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Derek Atkins wrote:
Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What
Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
-derek
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
-derek
Apparantly that is going away:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg00146.html
Yeah...
Too bad! It's really nice and useful!
Dan
-derek
--
Derek
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:20 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
-derek
Apparantly that is going away:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg00146.html
Yeah...
Too
Quoting Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Too bad! It's really nice and useful!
The functionality won't be going away (though it might hiccup a bit),
since it definitely is still useful. Just the communication
implementation between NM and named. Everyone agrees that it's nice to
have
Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo