@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ public SSLContext get() {
SSLContext sc;
sc = SSLContext.getInstance(SSL);
For consistency, should this also be changed to `SSLContext.getInstance(TLS)`?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
DigitalOcean has added some more images that are not available in all regions,
and that made some live tests to fail. This change configures the tests to use
an image known to exist in all regions to avoid this issue.
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull
public static class Builder {
- /**
- * @see DockerTemplateOptions#volumes(java.util.Map)
- */
- public static DockerTemplateOptions volumes(MapString, String
volumes) {
- DockerTemplateOptions options = new DockerTemplateOptions();
- return
@demobox The test change required was to modify a JSON file to use an array of
Strings for Entrypoint instead of null. This would have failed the test by
crashing the JSON parser, but it now passes. I think documenting the DTOs is
not strictly necessary, they're not created by users, rather
@nacx @demobox @andreaturli Suggest ready to merge?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/89#issuecomment-59496509
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#321](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/321/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/93#issuecomment-59496849
[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1702](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1702/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-cli/197/
--
[...truncated 260 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process (default) @
jclouds-cli-branding ---
[INFO] artifact com.google.guava:guava: checking for updates from central
@jdaggett do you think it is good to merge it?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-59516058
This change can be safely cherry-picked to 1.8.x after the release.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/93#issuecomment-59516330
Pushed to master as
[c005ff7](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs.git;a=commit;h=c005ff7d08332a1e32d5f75bd9442f6b15d45c16).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/93#issuecomment-59517238
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-cli/198/
--
[...truncated 1432 lines...]
Downloading:
http://repo.cloudbees.com/content/repositories/central/org/apache/maven/maven-artifact/2.0.5/maven-artifact-2.0.5.pom
Downloaded:
@andreaturli One last thing! I would suggest naming `softlayer-cci` just
`softlayer` for all references in this PR. WDYT?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-59525054
Ping!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/118#issuecomment-59542826
- Removed BlueLock Getting Started Guide as per jclouds [PR
543](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/543)
- Updated product names in `guides/index.md`
- Updated/reorganized the order of features in `guides/karaf.md`
- Updated ISO codes and labs providers in `reference/providers.md`
You can
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#413](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/413/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/136#issuecomment-59545012
Go to
http://f4b269e9152b20be37ac-63cdf1aaaf2ff605a48be3a4b22fc4ea.r82.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/136#issuecomment-59545156
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests
#466](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/466/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack
#1855](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1855/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1855/changes
Changes:
[Jeremy Daggett] JCLOUDS-694: Support StackApi list()
[Jeremy Daggett] JCLOUDS-694: Added ListStackOptions
[Jeremy Daggett] AutoValue prototyping
--
@andreaturli Thanks
@nacx Let me know when the image changes are ready, and I'll update the
provider to use the cache properly
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/89#issuecomment-59559351
@demobox I've been discussing with the people at CloudSigma the best approach
to get this pull request merged, and we've agreed to remove for now the
SecurityGroupExtension, and merge this just with the ComputeService.
The extension can be added later, but it presents some design challenges, as
@jdaggett yeah maybe it is less confusing, thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-59572197
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#414](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/414/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-59572210
Go to
http://38953854b8ad48589760-7931cc549aa729925d8b0c50b00695c3.r71.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-59572397
+ .ServerStatus,
NodeMetadata.Statusbuilder().put(ServerStatus.RUNNING,
NodeMetadata.Status.RUNNING)
+ .put(ServerStatus.STARTING, NodeMetadata.Status.PENDING)
+ .put(ServerStatus.STOPPING, NodeMetadata.Status.PENDING)
+ .put(ServerStatus.STOPPED,
Live test was failing.
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/jclouds-labs-google bugfix
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/60
-- Commit Summary --
* minor bug
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#163](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/163/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/60#issuecomment-59587888
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1479](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1479/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Daniel Broudy created JCLOUDS-755:
-
Summary: GoogleComputeEngineServiceLiveTest fails when run on its
own.
Key: JCLOUDS-755
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-755
Project: jclouds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Broudy updated JCLOUDS-755:
--
Component/s: jclouds-labs-google
GoogleComputeEngineServiceLiveTest fails when run on its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-753:
Component/s: jclouds-drivers
HttpCommandExecutorService(s) vulnerable to POODLE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-753:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1)
HttpCommandExecutorService(s) vulnerable to POODLE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14175761#comment-14175761
]
Andrew Phillips commented on JCLOUDS-753:
-
@[~diwaker]: Would be interested to
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ public SSLContext get() {
SSLContext sc;
sc = SSLContext.getInstance(SSL);
For consistency, should this also be changed to SSLContext.getInstance(TLS)?
Probably ;-) Will update...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#206](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/206/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/575#issuecomment-59594229
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1295](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1295/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/575#issuecomment-59595031
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1800/
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1856/
[jclouds » jclouds
#1801](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1801/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
40 matches
Mail list logo
