On Thu, 20 May 2010 09:25:42 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
> machines?
About the same, I think. I had started trying to figure out a way to do a
smarter dump (only dumping changed info) for my distributed
tagging/bug-tracking ide
On Thu, 20 May 2010 09:25:42 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
> machines?
About the same, I think. I had started trying to figure out a way to do a
smarter dump (only dumping changed info) for my distributed
tagging/bug-tracking ide
hough.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100520/
What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
machines?
In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered
identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine -
it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are a
problem, though.
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:44:18 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
> in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
> the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
> compatibility with the previous
