On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:54:03 +0100, pazz
wrote:
> expect the date_relative field for thread entries
> in notmuch search's json output
> ---
I pushed an amended version of this one (explaining why the date won't
change in the future), and the next patch as well.
d
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:54:03 +0100, pazz patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote:
expect the date_relative field for thread entries
in notmuch search's json output
---
I pushed an amended version of this one (explaining why the date won't
change in the future), and the next patch as well.
d
expect the date_relative field for thread entries
in notmuch search's json output
---
test/json |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/json b/test/json
index 5a2544c..d54bf25 100755
--- a/test/json
+++ b/test/json
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ add_message
expect the date_relative field for thread entries
in notmuch search's json output
---
test/json |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/json b/test/json
index 5a2544c..d54bf25 100755
--- a/test/json
+++ b/test/json
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ add_message
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:04:59 +0100, Patrick Totzke
patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the tip with git send-mail.
Hi, Patrick. You might have noticed my response to Felix a little while
ago. The git format-patch command outputs an email that is meant to be
sent directly to the
st*, followed by the patch that fixes
> the issue.
>
> Thanks!
>
> jamie.
------ next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-test-date_relative-in-notmuch-search-json-output.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuch
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:58 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> I wodered why "notmuch search --format=json" doesn't provide the
> "date_relative" field for
> results, as the show command does.
>
> I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this:
Hi, Patrick. I think this is a
Hi,
I wodered why "notmuch search --format=json" doesn't provide the
"date_relative" field for
results, as the show command does.
I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this:
diff --git a/notmuch-search.c b/notmuch-search.c
index faccaf7..b1adc03 100644
---
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:58 +0100, Patrick Totzke
patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wodered why notmuch search --format=json doesn't provide the
date_relative field for
results, as the show command does.
I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this:
Hi, Patrick.
:00 2001
From: pazz patricktot...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:36:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output
expect the date_relative field for thread entries
in notmuch search's json output
---
test/json |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0
Hi,
I wodered why notmuch search --format=json doesn't provide the
date_relative field for
results, as the show command does.
I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this:
diff --git a/notmuch-search.c b/notmuch-search.c
index faccaf7..b1adc03 100644
---
11 matches
Mail list logo