Hi Patrick,
This is how my toc appears:
Part 1 first part 11
(1) Chapter one 12 (2) Chapter two 13 (3) Chapter three 14
(4) Chapter four 15 (5) Chapter five 16
Part 2 second part 21
(1) Chapter one 22 (2) Chapter two 23 (3) Chapter three 24
(4) Chapter four 25 (5) Chapter five 26
Part
Dirar BOUGATEF wrote:
Hi Patrick,
This is how my toc appears:
Part 1 first part 11
(1) Chapter one 12 (2) Chapter two 13 (3) Chapter three 14
(4) Chapter four 15 (5) Chapter five 16
Part 2 second part 21
(1) Chapter one 22 (2) Chapter two 23 (3) Chapter three 24
(4) Chapter four 25 (5) Chapter
Wha
Thanks a lot to you all.
Hans,
I have tried:
\startnarrower[4*right] \placecontent \stopnarrower \blank[4*big]
This is exactly what i meant.
Unfortunately, there is a problem, which is in my opinion not related to
TOC, but to Tex (or Context, you'll be able to tell).
i get a result
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to influence the level of black
component generation in cmyk ConTeXt output?
Piotr
--
Piotr Kopszak, Ph.D.
Polish Art Gallery, National Museum in Warsaw
-http://kopszak.mnw.art.pl/
Hi,
Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to influence the level of black
component generation in cmyk ConTeXt output?
In the automatic conversion of metapost you mean? Well, you can turn black
generation on (\setupcolors[reduce=no]) or turn it off ([reduce=yes]) ...
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
In authoryear styles, year entries are usually required, so I am going to
keep this as it is now. You can either use \cite[author] for this case, or
you could build your own \cite command, in a similar way to Tobias' answer:
Sorry for bothering you that much. I'm now
Today I was about to install TeX Live 2003, to then install Context lastest
release. But I found that Tex Live 2004 was released the 27th (3 days ago).
I notice the texmf directory structure has been changed in 2004. What do you guys recommend? 2003+context? Or is the latest context installation
Hi,
Today I was about to install TeX Live 2003, to then install Context
lastest release. But I found that Tex Live 2004 was released the
27th (3 days ago). I notice the texmf directory structure has been
changed in 2004. What do you guys recommend? 2003+context? Or is the
latest context
I am using linux Fedora Core 3. It came witha *very* old tex installation with
context version 2003. If I understand your advice, I should use texlive2003
and thelatest context from lastweek upload in pragma?
thank youPatrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Today I was about to install TeX
Hello Ciro,
I am using linux Fedora Core 3. It came with a *very* old tex installation
with
context version 2003. If I understand your advice, I should use texlive2003
and the latest context from last week upload in pragma?
No, something more recent then texlive 2003. Perhaps texlive 2004
10 matches
Mail list logo