Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

Wow. How embarrassing - I am usually the one who chides my users about never actually trying simple experiments to see if something works. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

2008/4/30, Michael P. Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow. How embarrassing - I am usually the one who chides my users about never actually trying simple experiments to see if something works. ___ If your question is

Re: [NTG-context] Greek module still in use?

On May 1, 2008, at 4:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have unzipped the folder to my texmf tree so it looks like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ cd /usr/share/texmf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/texmf ls bibtex context dvipsls-R mft text- greek-2008.04.30 bin doc

Re: [NTG-context] Trouble with Index

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed. Question to the developers: given that our rule of thumb is material within {} will be typeset; material within [] is for setups etc., wouldn't it make sense to have the command as index[]? (Maybe with an alternative

[NTG-context] MetaPost 1.004 announcement

The MetaPost team is happy to announce a new release of MetaPost: -- MetaPost 1.004 -- The sources and a win32 package can be downloaded immediately from

Re: [NTG-context] two small questions about the mkiv roadmap

On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The DTD is a problem with the ConTeXts XML parser and has nothing to do with LuaTeX (hope this is right). i need a test file then (can look into it next week; i'm at bachotek now) OK, I hope this is a minimal test:

Re: [NTG-context] two small questions about the mkiv roadmap

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The DTD is a problem with the ConTeXts XML parser and has nothing to do with LuaTeX (hope this is right). i need a test file

Re: [NTG-context] two small questions about the mkiv roadmap

On May 1, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Easier for test because you need only one file. Thanks Wolfgang! Have fun in Poland! It's fathers day :-) I know. My two sons insisted on bringing me breakfast at 6.45. And they wanted to charge for it too :-) Thomas

[NTG-context] Line break and \in{....}[] command; bookmarks

Hi all, I use \definereferenceformat[insection][text=Section] however, sometimes the item is that long that Section 5.5 .. looks much nicer than a 5.5 sticking out of the margin. Is there a possibility to allow a line break between the text and the number? Secondly, I

Re: [NTG-context] Line break and \in{....}[] command; bookmarks

On Thu, May 01 2008, Tobias Burnus wrote: I use \definereferenceformat[insection][text=Section] however, sometimes the item is that long that Section 5.5 .. looks much nicer than a 5.5 sticking out of the margin. Is there a possibility to allow a line break between

[NTG-context] typo or bug report in type-buy.tex

Hi folks, From line 199 to 206 : \starttypescript [lucida,lucidabfm] [texnansi,ec,8r,uc] \definetypeface [lucida] [rm] [serif] [lucida] [default] [encoding=\typescripttwo] \definetypeface [lucida] [ss] [sans][lucida] [default] [encoding=\typescripttwo] \definetypeface

Re: [NTG-context] typo or bug report in type-buy.tex

On Thu, 01 May 2008 17:37:17 +0200 Renaud AUBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, From line 199 to 206 : \starttypescript [lucida,lucidabfm] [texnansi,ec,8r,uc] \definetypeface [lucida] [rm] [serif] [lucida] [default] [encoding=\typescripttwo] \definetypeface [lucida]

[NTG-context] typescript and memory usage

Hello list, Thanks to Hans, Hraban, Wolfgang and Aditya, I've successfully played with typescripts and Garamond PP as provided by Adobe with luatex. But I still have a little question :) By reducing my typescript to the strict minimum, as below, I'm still using 232 Mo (sic) of ram. My document

[NTG-context] defineitemgroup interferes with item reference

I cannot figure out the error in the following nested itemization with a reference. Is it a bug or am I overlooking something? Here is the smallest example I could make. Strangely, if I change the startproblemlist to startitemize and stopproblemlist to stopitemize, all is well.