Am 2018-07-29 um 21:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster
:
>>> I just made symbolsets for the current Font Awesome 5 fonts and published
>>> them together with some older collections:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/tree/master/symbols
>>
>> Does this contain more symbols that those in the fon
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 29.07.18 um 20:33:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi,
I just made symbolsets for the current Font Awesome 5 fonts and
published them together with some older collections:
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/tree/master/symbols
Does this contain m
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi,
I just made symbolsets for the current Font Awesome 5 fonts and
published them together with some older collections:
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/tree/master/symbols
Does this contain more symbols that those in the fontawesome symbol
Ahoi,
I just made symbolsets for the current Font Awesome 5 fonts and published them
together with some older collections:
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/tree/master/symbols
Have fun!
Greetlings, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG K
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:13:07 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 06.10.2012 um 06:03 schrieb Mari Voipio :
>
> > I'd need the heart symbol. You know, the one that goes on Facebook
> > as <3. I think it is this Unicode symbol: ♥ U+2665 BLACK
> > HEART SUIT ♥ or ♥ or ♥
> $♥$
How sweet!
(The hea
Am 06.10.2012 um 06:03 schrieb Mari Voipio :
> Hello!
>
>
> I'm having one of those ConTeXt moments when I feel really stupid, but
> I just cannot figure this out
>
> I'd need the heart symbol. You know, the one that goes on Facebook as
> <3. I think it is this Unicode symbol: ♥ U+266
Hello!
I'm having one of those ConTeXt moments when I feel really stupid, but
I just cannot figure this out
I'd need the heart symbol. You know, the one that goes on Facebook as
<3. I think it is this Unicode symbol: ♥U+2665 BLACK HEART
SUIT♥ or ♥ or ♥
I'm using the LucidaOT (Un
Hello Wolfgang,
Indeed that is what works, but I tried to do
\setupsymbolset[astronomic,martinvogel 2] and that is wrong.
Anyway thank you!
Willi
On 12 Mar 2012, at 20:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> Am 12.03.2012 um 20:29 schrieb Willi Egger:
>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> thanks for this! I had
Am 12.03.2012 um 20:29 schrieb Willi Egger:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> thanks for this! I had still to experiment a bit, unitl detecting, that it is
> not possible to setup more than one symbolset at once….
Do you have a example because this works for me:
\usesymbols[mvs]
\setupsymbolset[martinvoge
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for this! I had still to experiment a bit, unitl detecting, that it is
not possible to setup more than one symbolset at once
Willi
On 12 Mar 2012, at 18:53, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> \usesymbols[mvs]
_
Am 12.03.2012 um 17:13 schrieb Willi Egger:
> Hi all,
>
> Also with the todays beta I am unable to get Martin Vogel symbols.
>
> If \showsymbols[martinvogel 2] is used a long list of symbols is typeset, but
> not what is defined as this symbolset.
>
> Calling
> \setupsymbolset[atronomic]
> \s
Hi all,
Also with the todays beta I am unable to get Martin Vogel symbols.
If \showsymbols[martinvogel 2] is used a long list of symbols is typeset, but
not what is defined as this symbolset.
Calling
\setupsymbolset[atronomic]
\symbol[zodiac]
does result in the text zodiac in the document.
Hi
12 matches
Mail list logo
