Re: [NTG-context] Thicker \cdot ?

2017-11-06 Thread Weber, Matthias
Thanks, this is very helpful. Matthias > On Nov 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Schmitz Thomas A. > wrote: > > > >> On 6. Nov 2017, at 21:44, Weber, Matthias wrote: >> >> It looks like Metapost is a good way of doing this. >> If anybody knows a better way, please let me know. > > Not “better,” but

Re: [NTG-context] Thicker \cdot ?

2017-11-06 Thread Schmitz Thomas A.
> On 6. Nov 2017, at 21:44, Weber, Matthias wrote: > > It looks like Metapost is a good way of doing this. > If anybody knows a better way, please let me know. Not “better,” but maybe simpler: you can just scale the cdot; if you want to be fancy, you can make a macro and center it vertically,

Re: [NTG-context] Thicker \cdot ?

2017-11-06 Thread Weber, Matthias
It looks like Metapost is a good way of doing this. If anybody knows a better way, please let me know. \def\fatdot{\startMPcode h := \strutheight-\strutdepth; k:=h/2; pickup pencircle scaled k; setbounds currentpicture to boundingbox unitsquare xyscaled (2*h, h);

[NTG-context] Thicker \cdot ?

2017-11-06 Thread Weber, Matthias
Dear List, I am looking for a ConTeXt way to create a thicker \cdot (but not as thick as \bullet). Minimal non-example \starttext \startformula a \cdot[1mm] b \stopformula \stoptext does not accomplish anything useful…. Thanks - Matthias __