On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
Robert Kern:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:26 AM, wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm working on an additional function for numpy/lib/twodim_base.py. I'm
>> trying to add some tests for the new function, and
>> numpy/lib/tests/test_twodim_base.py seems like the right place for
>> them.
>> My problem is
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
> >> wrote:
> >> > The offi
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>> > The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
>> > Only the VC builds
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> Only the VC builds do.
> As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
> no-one has contributed a fix for the V
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
> > The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> > Only the VC builds do.
> > As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> Only the VC builds do.
> As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
> no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
I'm b
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
On 14.04.2014 22:43, Carl Kleffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mingw has expm1. Is
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is this function suitable?
Regards
Carl
2014-04-14 21:34 GMT+02:00 Eric Moore :
>
>
> On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett >
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Warren Weckesser <
warren.weckes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The test function numpy.testing.assert_equal fails when comparing -0.0 and
> 0.0:
>
> In [16]: np.testing.assert_equal(-0.0, 0.0)
> ---
>
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
> >> Windows
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
>> Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
>>
>> It works fine, apart from the following tes
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
> Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
>
> It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
>
>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are we in a position to start looking at implementation? If so, it would
>> be useful to have a collection of test cases, i.e., typical uses with
>>
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
==
FAIL: test_special (test_umath.TestExpm1)
---
On 4/12/2014 5:20 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> The "set routines" [1] are in this category and may help
> you deal with partitions, but I would recommend using
> boolean arrays instead. If you commonly deal with both
> a subset and a complement, set representation does not
> give you a memory
The test function numpy.testing.assert_equal fails when comparing -0.0 and 0.0:
In [16]: np.testing.assert_equal(-0.0, 0.0)
---
AssertionErrorTraceback (most recent call last)
in ()
> 1 np.test
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:26 AM, wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm working on an additional function for numpy/lib/twodim_base.py. I'm
> trying to add some tests for the new function, and
> numpy/lib/tests/test_twodim_base.py seems like the right place for
> them.
> My problem is travis-ci tells me my
19 matches
Mail list logo