Oh! Right! It would mess up all the other siblings for a grid or layout. I
forgot about that part.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022, 6:38 AM Ralph Versteegen via Ohrrpgce <
ohrrpgce@lists.motherhamster.org> wrote:
> That sounds problematic for grid and layout slices: although you could
> adjust the child's
That sounds problematic for grid and layout slices: although you could
adjust the child's x/y so that it doesn't move, all the other children
would, and if you similarly adjust all of their positions so that they
don't move either, well, the result is quite absurd. It would be a far
better idea to
I was tempted to also make "gently" versions of the commands like "slice to
back" or "move slice above" but didn't get around to it. They would be
useful for grids and layouts
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022, 11:53 PM Ralph Versteegen wrote:
> At least it's a convention, used consistently by all of two com
At least it's a convention, used consistently by all of two commands (I
think) :)
Making up new jargon seems to be unavoidable.
On Sat, 10 Sept 2022 at 12:22, James Paige via Ohrrpgce <
ohrrpgce@lists.motherhamster.org> wrote:
> This might also be my new favorite terrible naming convention :D
>
This might also be my new favorite terrible naming convention :D
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:21 PM subversion--- via Ohrrpgce <
ohrrpgce@lists.motherhamster.org> wrote:
> james
> 2022-09-09 17:21:42 -0700 (Fri, 09 Sep 2022)
> 170
> Add "gently reparent" command, alternative to "set parent" but that
