great improvement from
what I was running on 0.9.7.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:34 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too
Hi Ryan,
indeed that's a better
ecific time period.
regards,
Armin
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Vanderwerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Armin Waibel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: is this
OJB Users List
Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too
Hi Ryan,
> The problem with that fix is that it wipes out the entire application
> cache for OJB each time you get a sequence, obviously not a very
elegant
> solution.
Yes, a really dirty hack!
A solution
>; "Armin Waibel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:11 PM
Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too
Thanks Armin, caching was definitely the problem!
The problem with that fix is that it wipes out the entire application
ca
ng on data).
Thanks again,
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:49 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too
Hi Ryan,
maybe it's a caching problem.
In Se
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:50 AM
Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too
I've upgrades to 0.9.9 and I can verify this is still happening.I make a
copy of a test
I've upgrades to 0.9.9 and I can verify this is still happening.I make a
copy of a test table that I write to, and I have 2 servlet engines
writing to the same database, the each instance of OJB of each server
overwrites the OJB_HL_SEQ with conflicting values for each app server.
This causes 2 prob