Sylvain Juge wrote:
It seems that when I load OJB, it doesn't automatically load the
repository_database.xml file that is in the build/resources folder
on runtime. I've seen that OJB is able to work like that, but I don't
want to do it on runtime, just use static xml config files. Since i'm
an
=
PersistenceBrokerFactoryFactory.instance().defaultPersistenceBroker();
and I don't have problem, but I'm not an expert.
-Mensaje original-
De: Rajadurai K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 06 de octubre de 2004 11:58
Para: 'OJB Users List'
Asunto: RE: Need Help !
hi,
I think U have to increase
Unless your Father has a very large number of children (as can occur in
a Construction and the elements of construction in a price building
system), you will find easier to get all childrens and implements two
business methods in your Father bean: getFemaleChildrens() and
getMaleChildrens().
Thanks Edson for your quick answer.
We ve already seen your approach. The problem we see with it,is in our
real world, the fact that attributes values are more than two in some
cases (male and female is just a set of two for this example), and as you
say, in some cases there is a large numbre
Hi Gustavo,
did you see the query customizer stuff?
http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Customizing%20collection%20queries
regards,
Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Edson for your quick answer.
We ve already seen your approach. The problem we see with it,is in our
real world, the fact
, April 27, 2004 8:47 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Need help to auto-retrieve some individuals
Thanks Edson for your quick answer.
We ´ve already seen your approach. The problem we see with it,is in our
real world, the fact that attributes values are more than two in some
cases (male and female
, 2004 8:52 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Need help to auto-retrieve some individuals
Hi Gustavo,
did you see the query customizer stuff?
http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Customizing%20collection%20queries
regards,
Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Edson for your quick answer.
We
