Re: objects in cache after transaction abort

2004-01-03 Thread Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior
Hi Armin, Hi Jair jr, Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote: Hi Armin, Thank you for your fast reply. hmm, this should not happend. Do you use checkpoint() or flush() in your code? This only could happens when the object was already in DB. Only the PersistenceBrokerImpl and

Re: objects in cache after transaction abort

2004-01-03 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi, Is this fix going to be available in the final 1.0 version coming out in 1 or 2 days? yes, a fix or workaround regards, Armin Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote: Hi Armin, Hi Jair jr, Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote: Hi Armin, Thank you for your fast reply. hmm, this

Re: objects in cache after transaction abort

2004-01-02 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Jair jr, Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote: Hi Armin, Thank you for your fast reply. hmm, this should not happend. Do you use checkpoint() or flush() in your code? This only could happens when the object was already in DB. Only the PersistenceBrokerImpl and RsIterator class push

Re: objects in cache after transaction abort

2003-12-31 Thread Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior
Hi Armin, Thank you for your fast reply. hmm, this should not happend. Do you use checkpoint() or flush() in your code? This only could happens when the object was already in DB. Only the PersistenceBrokerImpl and RsIterator class push objects to cache. If you abort the tx, the PB

objects in cache after transaction abort

2003-12-30 Thread Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior
Hi, I am using ojb1.0_rc5, ODMG api with OJB queries, mysql4 (innodb tables) in Linux Red Hat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.20-20.7). I moved from rc4 to rc5 recently and I noticed that sometimes the objects persisted inside an aborted transaction are still in cache when another transaction is