https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209364
pachtche...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pachtche...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334068
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry dubinin2...@gmail.com ---
Albert, Jaan, thank you for your comments!
Jaan, despite of that (1) would not help for the current file, you said that
you can modify Okular's layout detection algorithm so that it will be able to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334088
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334088
--- Comment #22 from ptomb...@xcski.com ---
Do you know if your libkscreen patch fixes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331784? That might help get them to hurry
up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334088
--- Comment #23 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org ---
I have no idea.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334210
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334210
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|In-line annotation font |PDF: In-line annotation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334210
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334068
--- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org ---
Jaan, poppler supports tagged pdf, you can always have a look at it.
About improvements for this bug to go away, they're always welcome :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334251
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |HI
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
finstrodelapradera-fo...@yahoo.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||finstrodelapradera-foros@ya
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
--- Comment #3 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org ---
You'll have to give me some examples, everything looks fine here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
--- Comment #4 from finstrodelapradera-fo...@yahoo.es ---
Created attachment 86434
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=86434action=edit
Okular vs embebbed PDF chrome reader - filling form
In this one, you can see a lot of things:
- Legibility:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
--- Comment #5 from finstrodelapradera-fo...@yahoo.es ---
Created attachment 86435
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=86435action=edit
Okular vs embebbed PDF chrome reader - form filled (hidden form)
When not in Show form, text entered in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334228
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334210
--- Comment #2 from chris.tay...@cantab.net ---
Should I file a bug report against Poppler then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334297
Bug ID: 334297
Summary: Highlighter of the review tool does not work correct
in rotated views of the pdf document
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: 0.17.5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334297
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334210
--- Comment #3 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org ---
Sure
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117267/#review57222
---
Do we really need to offer the user to set a width with a two
21 matches
Mail list logo