https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
--- Comment #5 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Having wish requests be correct makes it easier for them to be taken into
account, yes.
*myself* have no interest in adding editing features to Okular, so I will
ignore it anyway.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
--- Comment #4 from vytas ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3)
> (In reply to vytas from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> > > > Okular does offer Notes, but they are just hidden files in the
> > > > direc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
--- Comment #3 from Albert Astals Cid ---
(In reply to vytas from comment #2)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> > > Okular does offer Notes, but they are just hidden files in the directory,
> > > thus provide no portability.
> >
> >
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
--- Comment #2 from vytas ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> > Okular does offer Notes, but they are just hidden files in the directory,
> > thus provide no portability.
>
> What? Are you using an Okular from the last milenia or wha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--- Comment #1 from Albert As
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414914
Bug ID: 414914
Summary: Add basic PDF editing features
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: wishlist
/Scribus in Okular.
> Would it be reasonable to introduce an abstraction for the editing features,
> but implement it only for PDF for a start?
From my side: yes.
Best,
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to start a KDE editing app from
scratch.
:-)
I agree with Albert that the need for a generic abstraction will make
the features much harder. Additionally, those abstractions are mostly
public API, which introduces some pressure to do it right in the first
place.
Would it be reasonable t
> "Okular is a universal document viewer", yes we have *very light editing* but
> that's what people expect in a viewer. I don't think the general public
> expects a viewer to let them remove pages or reorder them.
I am not convinced of this claim.
>> * A separate competitive pdf editing applic
El dimarts, 26 de març de 2019, a les 10:17:48 CET, Oliver Sander va escriure:
> Dear Okular developers,
>
> at my day job I get asked about certain (pdf) editing features in Okular.
> Specifically, people would like to be able to delete and reorder pages,
> merge two documents, e
26 березня 2019, 11:18:01, від "Oliver Sander" :
> Dear Okular developers,
>
> at my day job I get asked about certain (pdf) editing features in Okular.
> Specifically, people would like to be able to delete and reorder pages,
> merge two documents, etc.
>
> In
Dear Okular developers,
at my day job I get asked about certain (pdf) editing features in Okular.
Specifically, people would like to be able to delete and reorder pages,
merge two documents, etc.
In the past, such editing features have been contentious, with people
wishing Okular to remain a
12 matches
Mail list logo