autogen.sh and some other autotools files are not included because they
are not listed in the corresponding Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST variable).
They weren't included in OFED-1.0 also.
If openib sources will be taken as is (without running 'make dist') then
it will require from users to install u
Hal> Why shouldn't they be included ? Weren't they included in
Hal> OFED 1.0 ?
Hal> This makes life difficult for those who want to rebuild based
Hal> on the OFED released sources.
Why? Distributing tarballs made with "make dist" seems like the
sanest thing to me.
- R.
___
Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openfabrics-ewg] OFED 1.1-rc1 is available
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 09:28, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
> > The OFED-1.1-rc1 source tar ball (openib-1.1.tgz ) created by build_ofed.sh
> > script (from https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branch
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 09:28, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
> The OFED-1.1-rc1 source tar ball (openib-1.1.tgz ) created by build_ofed.sh
> script (from https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.1/ofed/build)
>
> build_ofed.sh script takes userspace libraries/binaries after executing:
>
> autogen.sh
>
The OFED-1.1-rc1 source tar ball (openib-1.1.tgz ) created by build_ofed.sh
script (from https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.1/ofed/build)
build_ofed.sh script takes userspace libraries/binaries after executing:
autogen.sh
configure
make dist
Therefor, autogen.sh is not a part of it and als
Why is the OFED 1.1-rc1 source tar ball missing files when compared with the
1.1 branch?
Of specific question is the absence of autogen.sh in libibverbs.
Ira
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:14:10 +0300
"Tziporet Koren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> Target release date: 12-Sep
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 09:14, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> Target release date: 12-Sep
> >>
> >> Intermediate milestones:
> >> 1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
> >> 2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
> >> 3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
> >>
> >
> > What is the start b
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> Target release date: 12-Sep
>>
>> Intermediate milestones:
>> 1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
>> 2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
>> 3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
>>
>
> What is the start build date for RC2 ? When do developers need to have
> their code in by
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 09:42, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> The schedule is sleeps in 2 weeks meaning:
Thanks.
> Target release date: 12-Sep
>
> Intermediate milestones:
> 1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
> 2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
> 3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
What is the start buil
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 16:59, Roland Dreier wrote:
> James> Why don't you find it useful as an InfiniBand diagnosis
> James> tool?
>
> James> In the absence of IPoIB (and therefore ICMP pings), it can
> James> be used to test connectivity.
>
> Sure, but AFAIK the ibping userspace a
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 16:36, James Lentini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason ib_ping.ko is not in this release?
>
> The OFED release team decided to only pull kernel sources from the
> upstream kernel.
There are some things which have not yet gone upstream
James> Why don't you find it useful as an InfiniBand diagnosis
James> tool?
James> In the absence of IPoIB (and therefore ICMP pings), it can
James> be used to test connectivity.
Sure, but AFAIK the ibping userspace app (which is required to use it
anyway) has a server mode, so yo
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> James> Roland, will ib_ping be moving upstream?
>
> No one has submitted it. And I really question what the point of it
> is anyway.
Why don't you find it useful as an InfiniBand diagnosis tool?
In the absence of IPoIB (and therefore ICMP pin
James> Roland, will ib_ping be moving upstream?
No one has submitted it. And I really question what the point of it
is anyway.
- R.
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To un
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Is there a reason ib_ping.ko is not in this release?
The OFED release team decided to only pull kernel sources from the
upstream kernel.
I understand why they did this, but I too had hoped that ib_ping would
be in the next OFED release.
Roland, will
Is there a reason ib_ping.ko is not in this release?
Ira
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:22:07 +0300
"Tziporet Koren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> of course I meant slips (we are all awake here :-)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzip
of course I meant slips (we are all awake here :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet Koren
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:42 PM
To: Hal Rosenstock
Cc: OpenFabricsEWG; openib
Subject: Re: [openfabrics-ewg] OFED 1.1-rc1 is availab
The schedule is sleeps in 2 weeks meaning:
Target release date: 12-Sep
Intermediate milestones:
1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
4. Code freeze (rc-x): 6-Sep
5. Final release: 12-Sep
Tziporet
-Original Message-
Fr
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:48, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In two week delay we publish OFED 1.1-RC1 on
> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.1/ofed/releases/
> File: OFED-1.1-rc1.tgz
Is there an update to the OFED 1.1 schedule going forward ?
-- Hal
1. Schedule:
Hi, Tziporet,
On 8/8/06, Tziporet Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> o iSER:
>- Stability
>- Testing more platforms (e.g. ppc64 and ia64)
>- Performance improvements
Only number two above is in the scope of OFED from our perspective, so
we prefer to have it listed alone.
Bryan, can you please add a "1.1rc1" version to bugzilla?
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tziporet Koren
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 20
21 matches
Mail list logo
