[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-09 Thread James Lentini
Can you confirm that removing the #if 0 on line 84 of dapl_performance_util.c works with the current DAT provider and IB stack? james On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Itamar Rabenstein wrote: In preparation for asking Roland about this, I added a print statement as you suggested. I actually see the ib

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-09 Thread Itamar Rabenstein
> > In preparation for asking Roland about this, I added a print > statement > as you suggested. I actually see the ib_device_attr structure's > max_qp_wr and max_cqe values as being initialized to 65535. > After taking a second look at the initialization code in > mthca_query_device(), I see

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-09 Thread James Lentini
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, James Lentini wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Itamar Rabenstein wrote: Current openib gen2 code is not reporting the max cq size and i dont think that we should put a fix number . if we want to get the number we need Roland to fill this number in mthca but as Roland said b

[openib-general] Re: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-09 Thread James Lentini
Committed in revision 2574. On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Itamar wrote: itamar> in order to enable kdapltest -T P i needed to remark attr that are not set by openib gen2 itamar> 1) ia_attr.max_evd_qlen itamar> 2) ia_attr.max_rdma_read_per_ep_in itamar> 3) ia_attr.max_rdma_read_per_ep_out itamar> itamar>

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-09 Thread James Lentini
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Itamar Rabenstein wrote: Current openib gen2 code is not reporting the max cq size and i dont think that we should put a fix number . if we want to get the number we need Roland to fill this number in mthca but as Roland said before "what real App will meed this number?

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-08 Thread Itamar Rabenstein
> > Current openib gen2 code is not reporting the max cq size > and i dont think > > that we should put > > a fix number . > > if we want to get the number we need Roland to fill this > number in mthca but > > as Roland said before > > "what real App will meed this number?" > > I see the initial

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-07 Thread James Lentini
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Itamar Rabenstein wrote: */ Could we initialize the ia_attr.max_evd_qlen value correctly in the provider? Current openib gen2 code is not reporting the max cq size and i dont think that we should put a fix number . if we want to get the

[openib-general] RE: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-02 Thread Itamar Rabenstein
*/ > > > Could we initialize the ia_attr.max_evd_qlen value correctly in the > provider? > > > Current openib gen2 code is not reporting the max cq size and i dont think that we should put a fix number . if we want to get the number we need Roland to fill this nu

[openib-general] Re: [patch][kdapl] enable kdapltest -T P

2005-06-02 Thread James Lentini
A couple of questions below: On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Itamar wrote: in order to enable kdapltest -T P i needed to remark attr that are not set by openib gen2 1) ia_attr.max_evd_qlen 2) ia_attr.max_rdma_read_per_ep_in 3) ia_attr.max_rdma_read_per_ep_out also there was bug in kdapltest memory regi