On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 09:15 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Here's a long-standing bug that lockdep found very nicely.
> >
> > Ingo/Arjan, can you confirm that the fix looks OK and I am using
> > spin_lock_nested() properly? I couldn't find much documentation or
> > many
Roland Dreier wrote:
> Here's a long-standing bug that lockdep found very nicely.
>
> Ingo/Arjan, can you confirm that the fix looks OK and I am using
> spin_lock_nested() properly? I couldn't find much documentation or
> many examples of it, so I'm not positive this is the right way to
> handle
Here's a long-standing bug that lockdep found very nicely.
Ingo/Arjan, can you confirm that the fix looks OK and I am using
spin_lock_nested() properly? I couldn't find much documentation or
many examples of it, so I'm not positive this is the right way to
handle this fix.
I'm inclined to put th
