On 02/20/11 21:27, Okky Hendriansyah wrote:
Hi WK,
AFAIK, the most available consumer level boards out there that support ECC RAM
is ASUS. Not all ASUS boards though, but I see it more from ASUS than other
board. At least that's the way they are in my country. I'm having difficulties
on findi
I've found memoryx.com has some of the best prices and often most obscure RAM
available. They'll even build their own if necessary and their support is top
notch.
-Gary
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://ope
Hi WK,
AFAIK, the most available consumer level boards out there that support ECC RAM
is ASUS. Not all ASUS boards though, but I see it more from ASUS than other
board. At least that's the way they are in my country. I'm having difficulties
on finding Unbuffered ECC RAM, since usually consumer
On 02/20/11 08:11, Deano wrote:
Hi,
The nice man at echelog.matzon.dk, hosts nicely presented IRC logs for
various open source projects, I asked him to add OI which he has now done.
So for those who either can't hang on IRC all day or just prefer reading at
your leisure, there are now links o
Does the Gigabyte board handle ECC memory? After my backups started failing
verification, I realized how easily a stick of bad ram can corrupt files, and I
made sure my motherboards support ECC memory. It's not too expensive, but I
wish it was more widely used so the price would drop further.
Trying to set up a new amd64 server for doing Illumos builds and ran
into this...
# pkg install developer/java/jdk
Creating Plan /pkg: No matching version of developer/java/jdk can be installed:
pkg://openindiana.org/developer/java/jdk@0.5.11,5.11-0.148:20101125T003225Z:
This version is excluded
On 2011-02-20 10:21, Alexander Lesle wrote:
Hello Robin Axelsson and List,
On Februar, 20 2011, 00:15 wrote in [1]:
On 2011-02-19 19:26, Alexander Lesle wrote:
Hello Robin Axelsson,
am Samstag, 19. Februar 2011 um 02:14 hat u.a.
in mid:4d5f197c.4060...@student.chalmers.se geschrieben:
I
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:07:48AM -0800, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Michael Schuster wrote:
> > Ops Center isn't a replacement for xVM (the hypervisor), but a management
> > tool.
>
> Correct. But there hasn't been any confirmation from Oracle as to whether xVM
> (or any
Am Sonntag, den 20.02.2011, 19:45 +0100 schrieb Bernd Helber:
>
> Personally if i had to run a business... i would stick to the
> Original.
> Also think about, you get what you pay for.
true words :-) But the money we get from the university isn't the same
years before :-/
So, I will check free
Am 20.02.11 18:31, schrieb Denny Schierz:
> hi Bernd,
>
> yeah, but the problem is, OpenSolaris is death and we don't get any
> (security?) updates more.
>
I'm fully aware about this issue. In Fact its dead.
But is it necessary for you to get every update for a Failover Solution
in your scenari
hi Bernd,
Am Sonntag, den 20.02.2011, 17:58 +0100 schrieb Bernd Helber:
> the only solution for this issue is to install Opensolaris 2009.6 and to
> build Open HA Cluster from source. It's comparable to Sun Cluster 3.2
yeah, but the problem is, OpenSolaris is death and we don't get any
(security
Dear Denny.
For the moment
the only solution for this issue is to install Opensolaris 2009.6 and to
build Open HA Cluster from source. It's comparable to Sun Cluster 3.2
For the future You may have a look onto
http://www.illumos.org/projects/ihac
The other Alternative could be the FreeBSD HAST
The map with flashing locations is something :)
Don't think that IRC logs are much readable though.
On 20.02.2011 21:11, Deano wrote:
Hi,
The nice man at echelog.matzon.dk, hosts nicely presented IRC logs for
various open source projects, I asked him to add OI which he has now done.
So for t
hi,
we want to build a two node failover cluster for exporting ZFS Volumes via
ISCSI. The nodes are connected both to one 90TB SAS storage. We had success
with Solaris 10 and the HA Storage plus Cluster package (3.x), but after Oracle
has changed the license with Sol10/U9, we can't use it anymo
Hi,
The nice man at echelog.matzon.dk, hosts nicely presented IRC logs for
various open source projects, I asked him to add OI which he has now done.
So for those who either can't hang on IRC all day or just prefer reading at
your leisure, there are now links off the wiki at
http://wiki.openin
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:09 AM, taemun wrote:
> Note that ZFS isn't intrinsically any more likely to die from a bad bit in
> RAM than any given file system, but it is going to be able to *tell you when
> it occurs*.
Actually, zfs is far more likely to have problems due to a bad bit.
Most file sy
ECC RAM provides a mechanism by which the data stored can be checked, and
given a small enough error, repaired. Standard RAM doesn't provide this.
Buffering is done at the hardware level to increase throughput (gigabytes
per second) at the expense of latency (nano seconds per operation). Your
choi
Am 20.02.2011 15:10, schrieb Harry Putnam:
> Good info thank you. Is there not any problem accessing data on
> something that size either?
No. Not "that size".
See mail from Edward Martinez; "info about Solaris and the new
4K-Sector-Disks (e.g. WDxxEARS)"; 2011-02-09 in this mailing list or
goo
ECC memory or not, buffered or not. What does it do/mean
At risk of being stoned for bringing this up again, I am not finding
threads from the past that provide (to me) a basic idea of what the
terms means and what the concepts do.
I'm sure this will sound horribly illiterate in computer tech,
Johannes Bohse writes:
> you do not need to worry about the size. zfs is very efficient in
> scrubbing and resilvering. zfs scrubs used sectors only and resilvers
> only "missing" transactions. Spare sectors are not involved in both
> complexity equations.
Good info thank you. Is there not any
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3925516/ForgeRock+Shines+on+Suns+Legacy+Identity.htm
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
h
On Feb 20, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Alexander Lesle wrote:
> http://kb.lsi.com/KnowledgebaseArticle15591.aspx?Keywords=15591
Per recent experience with one of their SAS HBAs, the 3ware line has suffered
in quality since their acquisition by LSI. But the other LSI cards are quite
usable as I've put a fe
On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Michael Schuster wrote:
> Ops Center isn't a replacement for xVM (the hypervisor), but a management
> tool.
Correct. But there hasn't been any confirmation from Oracle as to whether xVM
(or any) source will be available after Solaris 11 releases outside the
"Expres
Hello Harry,
Am 20.02.2011 05:40, schrieb Harry Putnam:
> ,
> | [Aside: the following drives could as well be 2 TB WD green (as the
> | 1tb WD black shown below) for an extra $33 per,(total $66), but I was
> | not sure if at some point the shear size begins to be a problem by
> | itself for th
Hello Robin Axelsson and List,
On Februar, 20 2011, 00:15 wrote in [1]:
> On 2011-02-19 19:26, Alexander Lesle wrote:
>> Hello Robin Axelsson,
>>
>> am Samstag, 19. Februar 2011 um 02:14 hat u.a.
>> in mid:4d5f197c.4060...@student.chalmers.se geschrieben:
>>> I would recommend that you choose a
25 matches
Mail list logo
