Hi All,
Is JavaFX using Apple Quicktime for video support?
Thanks,
-Tony
> Hi All,
> Apparently the JavaFX includes some libraries that use the obsolete
> Quicktime. When some submits to the Apple Store a JavaFX app it gets rejected
> based on JavaFX having the obsolete API. I found out how to fix it from
> someone else running into the same issue.
>
> http://stack
Thanks for the verification. No matter what state Quicktime is in it is no
longer accepted by the Apple Store.
I am guessing these new rules will soon apply to everything but I could be
wrong.
Regards,
-Tony
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:27 AM, David DeHaven
wrote:
> Hi All,
> Apparentl
Hi All,
Apparently the JavaFX includes some libraries that use the obsolete Quicktime.
When some submits to the Apple Store a JavaFX app it gets rejected based on
JavaFX having the obsolete API. I found out how to fix it from someone else
running into the same issue.
http://stackoverflow.com/qu
Here is the JIRA that is tracking this:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-34893
Steve
On 2014-03-25 11:46 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks for the verification. No matter what state Quicktime is in it is no
longer accepted by the Apple Store.
I am guessing these new rules will soon apply
I presume that Apple now want you to use AVKit which is new in 10.9.
However I don't understand how you can develop an app that targets 10.8
if its
unable to use QTKit since that's all there is on 10.8 or earlier.
Does the AppStore really disallow targeting something like half the
installed
Thanks I read it. I also added a new issue regarding Apple now needing a pinfo
file for the jdk plugin inside the bundle created by JavaFX deploy.
Regards,
-Tony
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:36 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I presume that Apple now want you to use AVKit which is new in 10.9.
Howe
Hi Phil,
What happened is when I submitted my app package it
uploaded and Apple ran a check and pointed out the issue but did not
suggest a solution.
There are other solutions for video out there but
not sure Apple would approve. I will find out soon with my next app but
for now trying not to
Therein lies The Problem, and why we had to go with QTKit when we supported
10.6... Every two releases they seem to deprecate half-baked APIs in favor of
some new half-baked API. At least as of 10.8 that seems to have stabilized
somewhat, as we transition more and more to an iOS clone.
We had
I see .. so AVFoundation was already there since 10.7, its AVKit that's
new in 10.9
but AV Foundation is what FX would use.
It looks like Apple starting encouraging migration to AV Foundation
about 18 months ago
based on the date of this document :-
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/tech
Apple has a long history of burning developers like this. It's the
price of running on their platform.
Steve
On 2014-03-25 3:30 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I see .. so AVFoundation was already there since 10.7, its AVKit
that's new in 10.9
but AV Foundation is what FX would use.
It looks like Appl
Yes, this is true, but QuickTime (despite it's horrible component architecture)
was stable and actually useful for a very long time, then they dropped it and
replaced it with what amounts to absolutely nothing useful. Only in 10.8 did
they start putting useful bits back in, it's still a long wa
As I said, Apple does this. It took cocoa (a "nice" API) years until it
had the functionality of carbon (an "awful" API). Believe me, I have
experienced the trail of dead API and the pointless developer rewrites.
Steve
On 2014-03-25 4:02 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
Yes, this is true, but Quick
13 matches
Mail list logo
