On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Personally I don't mind simplicity in build files. 99% of people run binaries
> or packages, 99% of people who don't run binary packages on Linux know what
> they are doing. Or won't mind downloading an extra few packages or not having
> th
Hello,
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Martin,
> Waiting for your decision.
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> make dist: require xsltproc, docbook-xsl, don't require playing with
>>> symlinks (assumes/requires running from version control checkout)
(Frank, you're not subscribed to opensc-devel mailing list, which is not a good
idea if you want to send mails here. I rescued the e-mail from moderation
because it is probably of interest to others as well (unlike the viagra and
"your wife photos attached" ones :) but you really should subscrib
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 18:56, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> On 10/5/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>>
>>> With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
>>>
>>> Supported mechanisms:
>>> RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN, keySize={1024,30
Martin,
Waiting for your decision.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> But... the only dependency we require is xsltproc, so maybe we can
> rethink this... Provided you agree that building the package with
> -
On Thursday, September 30 at 12:02PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> > The code (also needs a patched version of OpenSSL) is much more
> > extensive than other SM cards in opensc-sm.trunk, that's why I doubt
> > that there is a chance of integrating the nPA into OpenSC.
> What are the limitations in OpenSC
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:54, Viktor TARASOV
wrote:
>>> Actually in 'reader-pcsc', when getting the reader's list, the
>>> SCardConnect(SCARD_SHARE_DIRECT) is called for every reader. So, when
>>> one process holds the first reader, the second process cannot access the
>>> second reader -
On 10/5/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hello
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>> With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
>>
>> Supported mechanisms:
>>RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN, keySize={1024,3072}, keypairgen
>
>>
>> Without OPenSSL, pkc11-tool -M
>>RSA
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:08, Andre Zepezauer
wrote:
> Attached is the final patch. Naming of flags as mentioned above. All
> changes were trivial with the exception of pkcs15init/pkcs15-oberthur.c
Thanks!
Commited in r4788 [1]
[1] http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/changeset/4788
__
Hello
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
>
> Supported mechanisms:
> RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN, keySize={1024,3072}, keypairgen
>
> Without OPenSSL, pkc11-tool -M
> RSA-PKCS, keySize={1024,3072}, sign, unwrap, decrypt
>
> Note tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
