Obviously the proposed expression to catch junk like this for postfix
is not good enough:
/[^[:print:]]{8}/ REJECT Your mailer is not RFC 2047 compliant
I'll have to work on more restrictive options :-(
For now I have disabled
OnCreate NotifyRequestorsAndCcs with template Correspondence
Title: Subject Alternative Name : openssl and RFC 2459
Hi
I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This "Subject Alternative Name" is defined in this way :
id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
GeneralNames ::= SE
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 15 13:25:14 2002]:
> Hi!
>
> i use Your project in my Client-Server project.
> For example, my Server calls BIO functions to use opened socket
> for handshaking , after that init_ssl_connection and everything works
fine.
> But what will happen if i'll try to use cli
Hi Mrs
I am a PHD and i need some informations to see the
costs of the cryptographics loads in WTLS.
Is there any benchmark to compte the delay of
RSA certificate & encryption SHA-1, and DES (in a palm pilot)
have you a benchmark also for the fixed network
with RSA 512?
if not:
It is poss
On Wed, May 15, 2002, CAMUS Sylvie FTRD/DTL/ISS wrote:
> Hi
>
> I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This "Subject
> Alternative Name" is defined in this way :
> id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
>
> SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
>
> General
