Re: PKCS11 engine support

Hi Bill, No, I don't have patch for 0.9.6c (problems with running Apache with it). This may take long cause management looking in merging Eracom PKCS11 engine with AdNovum PKCS11 patch, which usually take long time ... Cheers, Zoran Subject:  Re: PKCS11 engine support From:     "William Jame

[openssl.org #49] Patch on top malloc fix

Hello, The last malloc fix I sent introduced its own rather silly bug. Please apply the attached patch on top -- sorry. Thanks, -- Adi Stav - developer Topaz Prism R&D Mercury Interactive +972-3-5399481 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: [openssl.org #52] Bug in crypto/cversion.c:84

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:36:39AM -0500, Chuck Aaron wrote: > Has anyone looked into the SSH Secure Shell Server problem. Take a > look at http://www.caic.org/ciac/bulletins/m-081.shtml Whileas the problem itself is worth being noted, I don't think that openssl-dev is the appropriate forum to di

Re: [openssl.org #52] Bug in crypto/cversion.c:84

Has anyone looked into the SSH Secure Shell Server problem. Take a look at http://www.caic.org/ciac/bulletins/m-081.shtml Chuck "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" wrote: > > Hi there, > it seems that in line 84 in crypto/cversion.c there is a bug: > > eg. if you run Configure with -DDEVRANDOM=\"/dev/

[openssl.org #52] Bug in crypto/cversion.c:84

Hi there, it seems that in line 84 in crypto/cversion.c there is a bug: eg. if you run Configure with -DDEVRANDOM=\"/dev/random\" and therefore the compiler is invoked with gcc -DDEVRANDOM=\"/dev/random\" you get an error of an unknown string "dev". Maybe you could stringify the whole string

RE: [openssl.org #49] Unchecked return values

I waited for any others to comment but no-one did, so here's a couple of cents. While it might make sense in a server enviroment to have such a "malloc", complete with memory pools and whatnot, it still doesn't forgive an application from checking malloc return codes and dealing with a no-memor

[openssl.org #40] util/cygwin.sh has wrong permissions

Thanks, I have fixed it in the repository. Best regards, Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Mana

[openssl.org #51] OpenSSL 0.9.7 -BUG - WIN32

Hi, There is a bug in 'e_os.h'. The effect is that Win32 multithreaded applications crash. The problem is that currently OPENSSL_SYS_MSDOS is defined also for Win32 platform, and MS_STATIC is defined as 'static' as follows: #if defined(OPENSSL_SYS_MSDOS) # define MS_STATIC static #

[openssl.org #45] make test failed

Thanks, ticket closed, Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAI

[openssl.org #45] make test failed

[guest - Sat May 18 18:27:31 2002]: > make test gives: > > test a^b%c implementations > ./exptest > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 116: realloc: Assertion > `ptr == alloc_last_block' failed! > make[1]: *** [test_bn] Error 127 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/v01/openssl-0.9.6d/ope

Bad support for short timeformat in ASN1_UTCTIME_cmp_time_t()

Hi, I'm using openssl with old certificates that has no seconds in the timefield. This means that the ASN1_TIME string is 11 bytes. The length is not hardcoded in the x509 pieces, but in the ASN1_UTCTIME_cmp_time_t() function (in crypto/asn1/a_utctm.c) a length of 13 bytes is hardcoded. My c