Re: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

2002-12-30 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> If I understand you correctly, the 0.9.7 related part of the problem is > resolved. Yes. > Therefore the Milestone should be moved to 0.9.8, shouldn't > it? Done. A. __ OpenSSL Project http://

Re: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

2002-12-13 Thread Andy Polyakov
> > Gotten anywhere? > > Not yet. Well, I can tell that it's not assembler fault (it fails even > if I compile with no-asm) and it's the same fault with both cc and gcc. > Weird... > > > Is this part of the things you and I have discussed today? > > No. A. ^^ But it probably should be! A. ___

Re: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

2002-12-13 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Gotten anywhere? Not yet. Well, I can tell that it's not assembler fault (it fails even if I compile with no-asm) and it's the same fault with both cc and gcc. Weird... > Is this part of the things you and I have discussed today? No. A.

Re: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

2002-12-12 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:17:52 +0100 (MET), "David Asher via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> ummm... I think you sent this to the wrong person... I reported the bug. Don't worry about it. You're the registered requestor, that's why you got a copy directly. Andy

RE: [openssl.org #272] BN gives wrong result for mod_exp (all forms)

2002-12-12 Thread David Asher via RT
ummm... I think you sent this to the wrong person... I reported the bug. David. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte > via RT > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >