> The attached text file is a snippet from attempting to install
> openssl-1.1.0c on a Solaris 8 machine. As can be seen, failed when
> could not be found. There is no such file anywhere on this
> machine. As root, searched from the root directory for the file. Do have
> in more than one location
On 30/01/2017 21:44, Carter, James M. (MSFC-ES34) wrote:
The attached text file is a snippet from attempting to install
openssl-1.1.0c on a Solaris 8 machine. As can be seen, failed when
could not be found. There is no such file anywhere on this
machine. As root, searched from the root direc
The attached text file is a snippet from attempting to install openssl-1.1.0c
on a Solaris 8 machine. As can be seen, failed when could not be
found. There is no such file anywhere on this machine. As root, searched from
the root directory for the file. Do have in more than one location,
/u
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 11:44 AM, russellb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> it is often wise to send an empty list when requesting client certificates.
>
> How does one send an empty list?
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.html
Just pass a NULL stack.
--
Vikt
On 01/30/2017 10:44 AM, russellb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Quoth Mr Viktor Dukhovni, 'it is often wise to send an empty
> list when requesting client certificates.'
> How does one send an empty list?
>
That's generally the default server behavior when no CAs are configured
for that purpose
Quoth Mr Viktor Dukhovni, 'it is often wise to send an empty
list when requesting client certificates.'
How does one send an empty list?
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Why not?
This serial number could also be displayed as 3203232750, or 000BEED73EE, or
03203232750.
Cordialement,
Erwann Abalea
Le 30 janv. 2017 à 11:03, Matthias Ballreich
mailto:matthias.ballre...@outlook.de>> a écrit :
thanks for explanation.
But why did Windows Cert Manager and Firefox Ce
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Matthias Ballreich
wrote:
> thanks for explanation.
>
> But why did Windows Cert Manager and Firefox Cert Manager show 00BEED73EE as
> serial number instead of BEED73EE (which openssl shows)?
Its just a presentation detail. It appears Microsoft and Mozilla take
th
thanks for explanation.
But why did Windows Cert Manager and Firefox Cert Manager show 00BEED73EE as
serial number instead of BEED73EE (which openssl shows)?
Von: openssl-users im Auftrag von Viktor
Dukhovni
Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Januar 2017 17:00:53
An: op
Hi
Can you please clarify if CVE-2016-7055 only impact x86_64 platform ? What
about other platforms listed in crypto/bn/asm/ folder which has Montgomery
multiplication procedure, is it impacted ?
Thanks
Regards
Sandeep
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailm
10 matches
Mail list logo