On 08/10/2011 12:00 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Just a question/thought -- has there been any discussion with the GitHub
> folks about whether the deficiencies you talk about are on their roadmap, and
> if not, can we get them addressed? E.g., if they put in hooks at the
> appropriate places in
og.html
Cheers,
jay
> -Original Message-
> From: "Monty Taylor"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 2:29pm
> To: "Jay Pipes"
> Cc: "Dan Prince" , openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Status of Git/Gerrit Code Hosting/Review
&g
Just a question/thought -- has there been any discussion with the GitHub folks
about whether the deficiencies you talk about are on their roadmap, and if not,
can we get them addressed? E.g., if they put in hooks at the appropriate places
in their pull request system...
Cheers,
On 09/08/2011,
committed code) what they prefer?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: "Monty Taylor"
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 2:29pm
To: "Jay Pipes"
Cc: "Dan Prince" , openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Status of Git/Gerrit Code Hosting/Review
>> L
ou can understand
> given the large number of people with conflicting interests was ... fun.
>
> In looking at things - it seemed that, to be quite honest, the number
> one single change that would make the maximum number of people happy was
> switching from bzr to git, and there was nothing a
On 08/09/2011 02:57 PM, Christopher MacGown wrote:
>> So from a "look at the list of things to review" standpoint, I actually
>> feel like I have a much _clearer_ understanding of what each thing is
>> before I review it than I did just looking a list of branch names on
>> launchpad.
>
> Given t
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> 2) I'd like to see a unified diff containing all the files on the Gerrit
>> review pages. Is there a way to do this or am I missing something?
>
> Also being worked on, by the Nokia team and should be in the next
> release of Gerrit:
> I think th
it is, of course, an excellent tool)
All in all, I'm not saying that all of the design choices are perfect,
and there are certainly things to work on - but I _do_ think that we're
in an excellent position now to actually effect the changes that we
need. (which will make it more effective to sit
t you've done in Gerrit.
Thanks,
jay
> Dan
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Jay Pipes"
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 2:50pm
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: [Openstack] Status of Git/Gerrit Code Hosting/Review
>
> Hello a
lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Status of Git/Gerrit Code Hosting/Review
Hello all,
tl;dr
===
Contributors have been giving Monty Taylor and Jim Blair feedback on
the Gerrit code review system over the last few weeks. Both the
Keystone and Glance projects have now migrated to using
Hello all,
tl;dr
===
Contributors have been giving Monty Taylor and Jim Blair feedback on
the Gerrit code review system over the last few weeks. Both the
Keystone and Glance projects have now migrated to using Git as their
source control system and Gerrit for code review and integration into
11 matches
Mail list logo
