Hello,
I am deploying Liberty Neutron in CentOS7, according to the official
document there are two interfaces in controller: one for management, the
other for public, and the public interface uses a special configuration
without an IP address assigned to it. But in my controller, there is only
Hello,
To be little bit more precise it allows AFAIK ingress from all instances
(ports) which have got same security group.
--
Pozdrawiam / Best regards
Sławek Kapłoński
sla...@kaplonski.pl
Dnia poniedziałek, 11 kwietnia 2016 21:32:55 CEST Remo Mattei pisze:
> it says default not 0/0 which is
In neutron a security group rule can have different types of "remote" -
either a CIDR or another security group.
The rule means that your "remote" is another security group - so any VM
in security group "default" can reach any port in this security group -
so "default" has opened all its ports
Hi All,
Appreciate if any of you could share lessons learned on Liberty Deployment. You
can unicast me to avoid an email spam.
Need to share the same with a customer who is planning start with a PoC on
Liberty.
Many Thanks,
Matt
___
Mailing list: ht
Hello,
I hava installed openstack Liberty using vxlan, though there are no error in
logs and I can create vm in computer node, I can't ping external network
either in vm or in router namespace. In my controller node, there is only
one Network Interface, and my tenant_network_type is vxlan. My q
it says default not 0/0 which is not from anywhere.
So that applies only for the local network (default)
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 21:15, Jagga Soorma wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> There is a default security group rule that has the following entry:
>
> --
> Direction: Ingress
> Ether Type: IPv4
> IP
Hi Guys,
There is a default security group rule that has the following entry:
--
Direction: Ingress
Ether Type: IPv4
IP Protocol: Any
Port Range: Any
Remote Prefix: -
Remote Security Group: default
--
Now this makes me think that it should basically allow all ingress ipv4
traffic (udp & tcp) on
Hi Victoria,
A few things to keep in mind. Many of the technical mentoring matches we
made were in anticipation of the Upstream University training. So if your
mentee is signed up for that, your early mentoring should focus on getting
them prepared for upstream and just basically introduced to the
Hi Victoria,
I suggest try to switch somehow, please write me a private email with the
details and we will find a solution.
Brgds,
Marton
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:53 PM Victoria Martínez de la Cruz <
victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> What should the mentor do with regard
Hi there,
What should the mentor do with regards to technical mentorship is the
mentee is more interested in a project that the mentor is not familiar with?
Thanks,
Victoria
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac
thanks for your answer
:)
Oleg
> Le 11 avr. 2016 à 13:54, Paul Michali a écrit :
>
> VPNaaS in OpenStack is a site-to-site VPN using IPSec. It is designed for the
> case when you have two clouds and want to interconnect them. So, one
> openstack cloud on each end, and an interconnecting n
VPNaaS in OpenStack is a site-to-site VPN using IPSec. It is designed for
the case when you have two *clouds* and want to interconnect them. So, one
openstack cloud on each end, and an interconnecting network. It's not
defined for a *road warrier* case, where you have a computer wanting to
connect
dear all,
I am trying to compare OpenVPN and VPNaaS usage in OpenStack.
I want to be able to create a VPN between VMs deployed in a single Openstack
cloud to ensure communication privacy and security.
I also want to be able to connect with my PC to the VPN.
To use OpenVPN, post install scripts
13 matches
Mail list logo
