Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Stepping down from core

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:01 AM Michal Rostecki wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to announce that I'm leaving the Kolla core team and I will not > work on this project anymore (at least in the near future). I'm fully > focusing on working in Kubernetes upstream directly. That said, I want > to thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:54 AM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for > Kolla session. The etherpad documents the folks interested and discussion > at summit[1]. > > This proposal is mostly based upon a c

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] One repo vs two

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:07 AM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Ryan had rightly pointed out that when we made the original proposal 9am > morning we had asked folks if they wanted to participate in a separate > repository. > > I don't think a separate repository is the correct approach based upon

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Place kolla-mesos in openstack-attic

+1 On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 3:08 am Michał Rostecki wrote: > +1 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla-mesos development being scaled back

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:43 PM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > I know a lot of folks are already aware of this, but as we head into > summit, in the interest of an Open Community, it is important to share this > information widely. The major implementors of the kolla-emsos reposito

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

+1 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:45 AM Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > +1 > > On 29 March 2016 at 11:39, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > > +1 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Bourke" > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 12:10:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [op

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Proposing Alicja Kwasniewska for core reviewer

+1 On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 2:58 am Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Core Reviewers, > > Alicja has been instrumental in our work around jinja2 docker file > creation, removing our symlink madness. She has also been instrumental in > actually getting Diagnostics implemented in a sanitary fashion. She h

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Proposing Angus Salkeld for kolla-core

t; Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.op

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla-mesos IRC meeting

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:44 AM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > I am -2 on a separate meeting. > > If there are problems with the current approach to how the agenda is > managed as it relates to mesos topics, lets fix that. If there are > timezone problems, lets try to fix that. Lets fix the prob

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

or background for our few core reviewers that couldn’t make it and the > broader community, Angus Salkeld has committed himself and 3 other Mirantis > engineers full time to investigate if Mesos could be used as an > orchestration engine in place of Ansible. We are NOT dropping our > An

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] resource_registry base_url

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:10 AM Steve Baker wrote: > On 23/10/15 09:35, Jay Dobies wrote: > > In looking through the environment file loading code, I keep seeing a > > check for base_url in the resource registry. It looks like a way to > > have the registry entries only be the filenames (I suppos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] core team nomination

+1 to both On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:42 pm Sergey Kraynev wrote: I'd like to propose new candidates for heat core-team: Rabi Mishra Peter Razumovsky According statistic both candidate made a big effort in Heat as reviewers and as contributors [1][2]. They were involved in Heat community work d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 03/09/15 02:56, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM Zane Bitter > <mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > On Wed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld > wrote: > >> > >>> 1. limit the number of r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM Steven Hardy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:35:52AM +0000, Angus Salkeld wrote: > >Hi > >I have been running some rally tests against convergence and our > existing > >implementation to compare. > >So far I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] [heat] Multi region support

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:30 AM Lowery, Mathew wrote: > Thank you Zane for the clarifications! > > I misunderstood #2 and that led to the other misunderstandings. > > Further questions: > * Are nested stacks aware of their nested-ness? In other words, given any > nested stack (colocated with paren

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Deployment of Lock / Unlock Operation like MUTEX

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 10:33 AM Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a situation which I faced, that can be reproduced. > > I did "heat resource-signal" multiple times simultaneously to scale > instance. > As a result 3 resources were made in the scaling group having max_size=2. > > "stack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

. >> >> Also AFAIK Sahara team plan to create functional tests with Heat-engine. >> We may add it as a non-voting job for our gate. >> Probably it will be good to have two different type of this job: with >> convergence and with default Heat. >> >>

[openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

Hi I have been running some rally tests against convergence and our existing implementation to compare. So far I have done the following: 1. defined a template with a resource group https://github.com/asalkeld/convergence-rally/blob/master/templates/resource_group_test_resource.yaml.templ

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core

On 31 Jul 2015 2:37 pm, "Steve Baker" wrote: > > I believe the heat project would benefit from Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn having the ability to approve heat changes. > > Their reviews are valuable[1][2] and numerous[3], and both have been submitting useful commits in a variety of areas in t

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16 2015, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > Hi Angus, > > > I just saw this, and I am concerned this is going to kill Heat's gate > (and > > user's templates). > > > > Will this be hidden

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > > > I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we > plan to > > do this, that should be introduced in v3 as opposed to v2, which should > remain > > the same and maintained

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Needing to fork templates to tweak things is a very common problem. > > Adding conditionals to Heat was discussed at the Summit. ( > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-heat-liberty-template-format). I > want to say, someone was going to pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Can't make it to the summit.

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Anant Patil wrote: > Hi, > > Due to some visa issues, my travel to Vancouver summit is canceled. > > Sorry to hear it, we will try and fill you in as best as possible. -Angus > I will miss meeting the Heat team and the planned session on convergence > phase 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat] sqlalchemy-migrate tool to alembic

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > On 5/14/15 7:12 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > >> >> >> On 5/14/15 11:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Question about Heat Tempest tests

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Yaroslav Lobankov wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a question about Heat Tempest tests. Is there any dsvm job that > runs these tests? At first glance no dsvm job runs them. > > We are using in tree functional tests now: https://github.com/openstack/heat/tree/m

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat] sqlalchemy-migrate tool to alembic

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > On 5/14/15 11:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> >> At one point we were exploring having both sqlalchemy-migrate and >> alembic run, one after the other, so that we only need to create new >> migrations with alembic and do not need to change

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][all] Architecture Diagrams in ascii art?

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Steve Baker wrote: > On 12/05/15 09:57, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> When learning about how a project works one of the first things I look >> for is a brief architecture description along with a diagram. For most >> OpenStack projects, all I can find is a bunch of rand

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] removing Angus Salkeld and Nick Barcet from ceilometer-core‏

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:56 AM, gordon chung wrote: > hi folks, > > as both have moved on to other endeavours, today we will be removing two > founding contributors of Ceilometer from the core team. thanks to both of > you for guiding the project in it's early days! > +1 from me, it's somewhat o

Re: [openstack-dev] Heat-engine fails to start

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Murali B wrote: > Hi > > I installed heat on juno version. > > When I start heat-engine it fails and I am seeing the below error > > cal/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/stevedore/extension.py:156 > 2015-05-07 13:06:36.076 10670 DEBUG stevedore.extension [-] found > ext

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][heat] Versioned objects backporting

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Jastrzebski, Michal < michal.jastrzeb...@intel.com> wrote: > W dniu 5/4/2015 o 8:21 AM, Angus Salkeld pisze:> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at > 9:25 PM, Jastrzebski, Michal > > mailto:michal.jastrzeb...@intel.com>> > wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][heat] Versioned objects backporting

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Jastrzebski, Michal < michal.jastrzeb...@intel.com> wrote: > Hello, > > After discussions, we've spotted possible gap in versioned objects: > backporting of too-new versions in RPC. > Nova does that by conductor, but not every service has something like > that. I w

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack/Resource updated_at conventions

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been looking into $subject recently, I raised this bug: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1448155 > > Basically we've got some historically weird and potentially inconsistent > behavior around updated_at, and I'm tryin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try... > > This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged > questions and though the self-nomination messages have included some > very interesting stuff I think it woul

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/22/2015 07:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 04/22/2015 04:09 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? > >> >

[openstack-dev] [heat][novaclient] heat gate is broken because of new novaclient

Hi Can we please have a new release of novaclient (after the below fix)? Heat's unit tests pass fine with: python-novaclient (2.23.0) but python-novaclient 2.24.0 introduces this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1437244 We still need this patch in: https://review.openstack

[openstack-dev] TC candidacy

their resources. I'm interested in either leading or participating in working groups from within the TC to address these issues. Thanks Angus Salkeld __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] is cloudwatch really deprecated?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, x Lyn wrote: > Since cloudwatch is deprecated, is there any plan to remove it away from > codes? Or still has some functions depend on this service? > No plans as yet, but all you have to do is not run the binary (heat-api-cw). > > 2015-04-18 2:29 GMT+08:00 Za

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion?)

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > As an Op, a few things that come to mind in that category are: > * RDO packaging (stated earlier). If its not easy to install, its not > going to be deployed as much. I haven't installed it yet, because I haven't > had time to do much other

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] how to send messages (and events) to our users

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-04-06 19:55:37 -0700: > > Hi all > > > > For quite some time we (Heat team) have wanted to be able to send > messages > > to our > > users (by user I do not mean the Operator, but the User that is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] autoscaling and load balancers

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Miguel Grinberg wrote: > Zane, replies inline. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> On 07/04/15 22:02, Miguel Grinberg wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource is somewhat limited at this >>> time, because when a sca

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] how to send messages (and events) to our users

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 04/06/2015 08:55 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> For quite some time we (Heat team) have wanted to be able to send >> messages to our >> users (by user I do not mean the Operator, but the Use

[openstack-dev] [all] how to send messages (and events) to our users

Hi all For quite some time we (Heat team) have wanted to be able to send messages to our users (by user I do not mean the Operator, but the User that is interacting with the client). What do I mean by "user messages", and how do they differ from our current log messages and notifications? - Our c

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][ceilometer]: scale up/ down based on number of instances in a group

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Daniel Comnea wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know if the above use case has made it into the convergence > project and in which release was/ is going to be merged? > > Hi Phase one of convergence should be merged in early L (we have some of the patches merged no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Decoupling Heat integration tests from Heat tree

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 26/03/15 10:38, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> following IRC discussion here is a summary of what I propose can be done >> in this regard, in the order of increased decoupling: >> >> 1) make a separate requirements.txt for i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] PTL Candidacy

There have been no other candidates within the allowed time, so congratulations Steve on being the new Kolla PTL. Regards Angus Salkeld On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > Candidacy confirmed. > > -Angus > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Steven Dake (s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] PTL Candidacy

n elected PTL and have asked Angus > Salkeld, who has no outcome in the election, to officiate the election [1]. > > For the Kilo cycle our community went from zero LOC to a fully working > implementation of most of the services based upon Kubernetes as the > backend. Recently I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat] Autoscaling parameters blueprint

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:01 PM, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) < moshe.eli...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hey, > > > > Can someone please share the current status of the “Autoscaling signals to > allow parameter passing for UserData” blueprint - > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/autoscaling-

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Unknown resource OS::Heat::ScaledResource

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 10/03/15 12:26, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I observed in one of the patch mentioned below, OS::Heat::ScaledResource >> is reported as unknown, could anyone help here to resolve the issue. >> Thanks. >> >> http://logs.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Heat] Expression of Bay Status

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Adrian Otto wrote: > Magnum Team, > > In the following review, we have the start of a discussion about how to > tackle bay status: > > https://review.openstack.org/159546 > > I think a key issue here is that we are not subscribing to an event feed > from Heat to t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, James Bottomley < james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > [...] > > > The key observations > > > > > > > > > The first key observation from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Stepping down from core

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Jeff Peeler wrote: > As discussed during the previous Heat meeting, I'm going to be stepping > down from core on the Heat project. My day to day focus is going to be more > focused on TripleO for the foreseeable future, and I hope to be able to > soon focus on rev

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat]Vote for Openstack L summit topic "The Heat Orchestration Template Builder: A demonstration"

n on how > easy it is to create a HOT template from Horizon. > > That's awesome, looking forward to see it! -Angus > > > Regards, > > Nikunj > > > > *From:* Angus Salkeld [mailto:asalk...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 4:52 AM >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat]Vote for Openstack L summit topic "The Heat Orchestration Template Builder: A demonstration"

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Aggarwal, Nikunj wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have submitted presentations for Openstack L summit : > > > > The Heat Orchestration Template Builder: A demonstration >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Changing "expression" delimiters in Mistral DSL

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Dmitri Zimine wrote: > SUMMARY: > > > We are changing the syntax for inlining YAQL expressions in Mistral YAML > from {1+$.my.var} (or “{1+$.my.var}”) to <% 1+$.my.var %> > > Below I explain the rationale and the criteria for the choice. Comments

Re: [openstack-dev] Filtering by metadata values

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Miguel Grinberg wrote: > Hi, > > We had a discussion yesterday on the Heat channel regarding patterns for > searching or filtering entities by its metadata values. This is in relation > to a feature that is currently being implemented in Heat called “Stack > Tags”

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] operators vs users for choosing convergence engine

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Steve Baker wrote: > A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to choose > whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations. For some > context you should read the spec first [1] > > Rather than doing this, I would like to prop

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] core team changes

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-01-27 17:36:41 -0800: > > Hi all > > > > After having a look at the stats: > > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/90 > > http://stackalytics.com/?module=heat-group&metric=person

[openstack-dev] [Heat] core team changes

Hi all After having a look at the stats: http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/90 http://stackalytics.com/?module=heat-group&metric=person-day I'd like to propose the following changes to the Heat core team: Add: Qiming Teng Huang Tianhua Remove: Bartosz Górski (Bartosz has ind

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][hot]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Dmitry wrote: > I have another question, is it possible to get the stack name in the hot > script? > E.g. > params: > $stack_name: {get_global_variable: $stack.name} > See: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#pseudo-para

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence Phase 1 implementation plan

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > I've mentioned this in passing a few times, but I want to lay it out here > in a bit more detail for comment. Basically we're implementing convergence > at a time when we still have a lot of 'unit' tests that are really > integration tests, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][heat] potentially breaking release of oslo.messaging Tuesday 27th

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We’ve held up the oslo.messaging release with the namespace package work > for a while now while we work with the nova, designate, and heat teams to > fix things up so their tests won’t break. We think the one remaining issue > is in heat, w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] query property on heat OS::Ceilometer::Alarm for juno/stable

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Karolyn Chambers wrote: > In Kilo, with the bug fix from 1326721, I can create an alarm like the > following with the "query" property. I use this alarm to monitor the health > of a server instance in the pool. In juno/stable, without the query > property, ceilome

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Remove deprecation properties

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Steve, Thanks for the feedback. > > On 16 January 2015 at 15:09, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 01:52:43PM +0400, Sergey Kraynev wrote: >> >Hi all. >> >In the last time we got on review several patches, which rem

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Remove deprecation properties

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov < gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Murano uses Heat templates with almost all available resources. Neutron > resources are definitely used. > I think Murano can update our Heat resources handling properly, but there > are at leas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Support status of Heat resource types

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Qiming Teng wrote: > Dear all, > One question we constantly get from Heat users is about the support > status of resource types. Some users are not well informed of this > information so that is something we can improve. > > Though some resource types are already

Re: [openstack-dev] Future-based api for openstack clients calls, that starts background tasks

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Konstantin Danilov wrote: > Boris, > > Move from sync http to something like websocket requires a lot of work and > not directly connected > with API issue. When openstack api servers begin to support > websockets - it would be easy to change implementation of mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran < visnusaran.muru...@hp.com> wrote: > Steve, > > > > My reasoning to have a “--continue” like functionality was to run it as a > periodic task and substitute continuous observer for now. > > I am not in favor of the --continue as an API. I'd sug

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][oslo] heat unit tests mocking private parts of oslo.messaging

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > As part of updating oslo.messaging to move it out of the oslo namespace > package I ran into some issues with heat. While debugging, I tried running > the heat unit tests using the modified version of oslo.messaging and ran > into test failur

[openstack-dev] [Heat] cancel the next 2 weekly meetings

Hi Lets cancel the next 2 weekly meetings as they neatly fall on Christmas eve and new years day. Happy holidays! Regards Angus ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Application level HA via Heat

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 22/12/14 13:21, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> So, lately I've been having various discussions around $subject, and I >> know >> it's something several folks in our community are interested in, so I >> wanted to get some ideas I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] For-each

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Nikolay Makhotkin wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the doc with suggestions on specification for for-each feature. > > You are free to comment and ask questions. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iw0OgQcU0LV_i3Lnbax9NqAJ397zSYA3PMvl6F_uqm0/edit?usp=sharing > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] People of OpenStack (and their IRC nicks)

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 12/09/2014 06:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > We already have a solution for tracking the contributor->IRC > > mapping--add it to your Foundation Member Profile. For example, mine > > is in there already: > > > > http://www.openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Max Complexity Check Considered Harmful

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > >> >> Not too long ago projects added a maximum complexity check to tox.ini, >> for example keystone has "max-complexity=24". Seemed like a good idea at >> the time, but in a recent at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by >> many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup >> resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Qiming Teng wrote: > Dear all, > > Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by > many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup > resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one and the Heat native one. As > more requests

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on proof > of concept designs for the convergence architecture. I think those efforts > have now reached a sufficient level of maturity that we should start > working together

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Marc Koderer wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed during our summit sessions we would like to expand the scope > of the Telco WG (aka OpenStack NFV group) and start working > on the orchestration topic (ETSI MANO). > > Therefore we started with an etherpad [1] to col

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Versioned objects cross project sessions next steps

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/24/2014 03:11 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> Dan Smith wrote: >> >>> 3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?. >>> >>> After some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Online midcycle meetup

543-0646 > Internet: bto...@us.ibm.com > Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680 > > > > From:Angus Salkeld > To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > Date:11/19/2014 06:56 PM > Subject:[openstack-de

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Online midcycle meetup

Hi all As agreed from our weekly meeting we are going to try an online meetup. Why? We did a poll (https://doodle.com/b9m4bf8hvm3mna97#table) and it is split quite evenly by location. The story I am getting from the community is: "We want a midcycle meetup if it is nearby, but are having troubl

[openstack-dev] [Heat] LP/review cleanup day

Hi all As an action from our meeting I'd like to announce a cleanup day on the 2nd of December. What does this mean? 1) We have been noticing a lot of old and potentially out of date bugs that need some attention (re-test/triage/mark invalid). Also we have 97 bugs in-progress I wonder if that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] HA cross project session summary and next steps

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > Hi all > > The HA session was really well attended and I'd like to give some feedback > from the session. > > Firstly there is some really good content here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossprojec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran < visnusaran.muru...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions > over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be > controlled by worker/observer notificatio

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-12 08:42:44 -0800: > > On 12/11/14 10:10, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-11 13:06:17 -0800: > > >> On 11/11/14 13:34, Ryan Brown wrote: > > >>> I am strong

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] APIImpact flag for specs

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Everett Toews wrote: > Hi All, > > Chris Yeoh started the use of an APIImpact flag in commit messages for > specs in Nova. It adds a requirement for an APIImpact flag in the commit > message for a proposed spec if it proposes changes to the REST API. This > will ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Alexis Lee wrote: > Zane Bitter said on Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:06:17PM -0500: > > FWIW literally everyone that Clint has pitched the JS > > idea to thought it was crazy ;) > > +1 > > > YAQL ... looks like line noise to me > > YAML representing function call stack

[openstack-dev] [Heat] midcycle meetup venue selection

Hi As promised at the dev sessions I have made a doodle so we can vote for a venue for the midcycle meetup. Here is the link: https://doodle.com/b9m4bf8hvm3mna97 Note: I have added one more option to the doodle "no meetup". I understand that this is a big financial burden and I'd like to get an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Orchestration Template] Hierarchical Heat templates

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Pradip Mukhopadhyay < pradip.inte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would like to ask the forum if something has already been considered to > make the HOT (Heat Orchestration Template) hierarchical. > > Basically the template file might consist of different personas putting >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: > Alexis Lee said on Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:34:13PM +: > > How about we support YAQL expressions? https://github.com/ativelkov/yaql > > Plus some HOFs (higher-order functions) like cond, map, filter, foldleft > > etc? > > We could also use Y

[openstack-dev] [all] HA cross project session summary and next steps

Hi all The HA session was really well attended and I'd like to give some feedback from the session. Firstly there is some really good content here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-ha-integration 1. We SHOULD provide better health checks for OCF resources ( http://linux-ha.org/

[openstack-dev] [all] Versioned objects cross project sessions next steps

Hi all I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are. 1. There is a lot of interest in other projects using oslo versioned objects and it is worth progressing with this ( https://review.openstack.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] New function: first_nonnull

On 06/11/2014 8:32 AM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > Excerpts from Lee, Alexis's message of 2014-11-05 15:46:43 +0100: > > I'm considering adding a function which takes a list and returns the first > > non-null, non-empty value in that list. > > > > So you could do EG: > > > > some_thing: > >

[openstack-dev] [Heat] no meeting this week

Hi As we are all (mostly) at summit, let's cancel this week's meeting. Regards Angus ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > > The low (and dropping) level of turnout is worrying, particularly in > > light of that analysis showing the proportion of drive-by contributors > > is relatively static, but it is always going to be hard to discern the > > motives of pe

Re: [openstack-dev] database hoarding

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Abel Lopez wrote: > It seems that every release, there is more and more emphasis on > upgradability. This is a good thing, I've love to see production users > easily go from old to new. > > As an operator, I've seen first hand the results of neglecting the > datab

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > > > IIRC, there is no method for removing foundation members. So there > > > > are likely a number of people listed who have moved on to other > > > > activities and are no longer involved with OpenStack. I'd actually > > > > be quite int

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] How can we get more feedback from users?-- Great idea Angus!

--- > > > > Nice work Angus ... great idea. Would love to see more of this. > > -S > > -- > > *From:* Angus Salkeld [asalk...@mirantis.com] > * Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 1:32 AM > * To:* OpenStack Developm

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] How can we get more feedback from users?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > Hi Angus, > > quite a noble intent, one that requires lots of attempts like this you > have started. > > On 10/23/2014 09:32 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > I have felt some grumblings about usability issues with H

[openstack-dev] [all] How can we get more feedback from users?

Hi all I have felt some grumblings about usability issues with Heat templates/client/etc.. and wanted a way that users could come and give us feedback easily (low barrier). I started an etherpad ( https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-useablity-improvements) - the first win is it is spelt wrong :-

  1   2   3   >