tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
remove the feature at this point. However, this is going to necessitate some
mechanical changes for most projects with docs and this mail serves as a heads
up and request for input before we proceed.
--
Since pretty much t
Excerpts from sfinucan's message of 2017-07-07 15:58:10 +0100:
> tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
> remove the feature at this point. However, this is going to necessitate some
> mechanical changes for most projects with docs and this mail serves as a heads
On 2017-07-07 11:20:30 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
> We also discussed changing the CI interface to build docs to use
> the "tox -e docs" command like contributors generally run locally.
[...]
Better still, something like `tox -e venv -- sphinx-build` would be
more in keeping with th
On 07/07/2017 12:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2017-07-07 11:20:30 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
We also discussed changing the CI interface to build docs to use
the "tox -e docs" command like contributors generally run locally.
[...]
Better still, something like `tox -e venv --
On 2017-07-07 18:03:11 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 12:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
> > Better still, something like `tox -e venv -- sphinx-build` would
> > be more in keeping with the spirit of the PTI to ensure projects
> > don't encapsulate any secret sauce into a sep
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 15:58 +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
> tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
> remove the feature at this point. However, this is going to necessitate some
> mechanical changes for most projects with docs and this mail serves as a
> head
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 15:58 +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
>> tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
>> remove the feature at this point. However, this is going to necessitate some
>> mechanical changes for most pro
Excerpts from sfinucan's message of 2017-07-10 17:20:37 +0100:
> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 15:58 +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
> > tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
> > remove the feature at this point. However, this is going to necessitate some
> > mechanic
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from sfinucan's message of 2017-07-10 17:20:37 +0100:
>> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 15:58 +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
>> > tl;dr: pbr's 'build_spinx' derivative is broken again, and we want to just
>> > remove the feature at this po
Excerpts from Anne Gentle's message of 2017-07-10 13:14:52 -0400:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from sfinucan's message of 2017-07-10 17:20:37 +0100:
> >> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 15:58 +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Of these, 'project' is static an
10 matches
Mail list logo