Lets use https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Icehouse-nova-oslo-sync to
keep track of things.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> GCB, Ben,
>
> Thanks for volunteering to help.
>
> GCB, reminded me that we should be doing this for python-novaclient in
> addition to nova itself. So t
GCB, Ben,
Thanks for volunteering to help.
GCB, reminded me that we should be doing this for python-novaclient in
addition to nova itself. So that being said, as I see it here are the
steps moving forward:
Note: as previously mentionedin this thread there already is a team
working on syncing osl
2014-02-22 5:09 GMT+08:00 Ben Nemec :
> /me finally catches up on -dev list traffic...
>
> On 2014-02-19 20:27, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
>> Assuming we
/me finally catches up on -dev list traffic...
On 2014-02-19 20:27, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
>> Assuming we consider it a good idea to sync up oslo-incub
Matt Riedemann wrote:
> This is kind of an aside, but I'm kind of confused now about how the
> syncs work with things that fall under oslo.rootwrap or oslo.messaging,
> like this patch [2]. It doesn't completely match the o-i patch, i.e.
> it's not syncing over openstack/common/rootwrap/wrapper.py
Hello All
I and Roman Podoliaka are familiar with the changes made to common db code,
so we are ready to help with syncing it to OS projects.
But we want to ask you for more activity in reviewing of these patches.
Thanks, Victor
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
>
> On
ns)"
>> ,
>> Date: 02/19/2014 09:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] Changes to oslo-incubator
>> sync workflow
>
>
>>
>>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> As a side to this, as an exercise I tried a
ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> Date: 02/19/2014 09:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] Changes to oslo-incubator
> sync workflow
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Joe Gordon
wrote:
> As a side to this, as an exercise I tried a osl
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> As a side to this, as an exercise I tried a oslo sync in cinder to see
> what kind of issues would arise and here are my findings so far:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74786/
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>
As a side to this, as an exercise I tried a oslo sync in cinder to see
what kind of issues would arise and here are my findings so far:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74786/
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/19/2014 7:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/19/2014 7:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
>> Assuming we consider it a good idea to sync up oslo-incubator code
>> before cutting Icehouse, then we have
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
> Assuming we consider it a good idea to sync up oslo-incubator code
> before cutting Icehouse, then we have a problem.
>
> Today oslo-incubator code is synced in a
On 2/19/2014 7:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
Assuming we consider it a good idea to sync up oslo-incubator code
before cutting Icehouse, then we have a problem.
Today oslo-incubator code is synced in ad-hoc manor, resultin
Hi All,
As many of you know most oslo-incubator code is wildly out of sync.
Assuming we consider it a good idea to sync up oslo-incubator code
before cutting Icehouse, then we have a problem.
Today oslo-incubator code is synced in ad-hoc manor, resulting in
duplicated efforts and wildly out of da
14 matches
Mail list logo
