[openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-03-27 Thread Joe Gordon
Hi All, Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1]. Instead of being forced to read raw RST or relying on github [3], we want a domain where we can publish the fully rendered sphinxdocs based specs (rendered with oslosphinx of course). So how about: specs.openstack.org/$proje

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-03-28 Thread Thierry Carrez
Joe Gordon wrote: > Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1]. Instead of > being forced to read raw RST or relying on github [3], we want a domain > where we can publish the fully rendered sphinxdocs based specs (rendered > with oslosphinx of course). So how about: > > specs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-03-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Thierry Carrez wrote: >> specs instead of docs because docs.openstack.org >> > should only contain what is actually >> > implemented so keeping specs in another subdomain is an attempt to avoid >> > confusion as we don't expect every approved blueprint to get implemented

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-03-28 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > Hi All, > > Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1]. Instead of > being forced to read raw RST or relying on github [3], we want a domain > where we can publish the fully rendered sphinxdocs based specs (rendered > with os

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-04-22 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Hi folks, would it be any possible to have same benefit for stackforge-hosted projects..? Thank you, On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-04-22 Thread Hayes, Graham
Hi, I would second that - if there was a way stackforge projects could use it, that would be great. Graham On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 18:52 +0400, Mike Scherbakov wrote: > Hi folks, > > would it be any possible to have same benefit for stackforge-hosted > projects..? > > > Thank you, > > > > On