On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Dan Prince wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 16:02 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > So, chatting with Giulio today about https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/
> > +bug/1521944
> > has be thinking about $subject.
> >
> > The root case of that issue is essentially a
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 16:02 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
> So, chatting with Giulio today about https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/
> +bug/1521944
> has be thinking about $subject.
>
> The root case of that issue is essentially a corner case of a stack-
> update,
> combined with some coupling within
On 04/12/15 03:41, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Dan Prince wrote:
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 16:02 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
So, chatting with Giulio today about https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/
+bug/1521944
has be thinking about $subject.
The root case of that
Zane I want to echo your sentiments exactly below. I agree with all of
the things basically.
The only thing I'd add is that no matter how good you make Heat's rollback
API, it will never be as good as git. So I would suggest that you just
have people roll forward from Heat's perspective, and let
On 03/12/15 09:41, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Dan Prince wrote:
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 16:02 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
So, chatting with Giulio today about https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/
+bug/1521944
has be thinking about $subject.
The root case of that
So, chatting with Giulio today about
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1521944
has be thinking about $subject.
The root case of that issue is essentially a corner case of a stack-update,
combined with some coupling within the Neutron API which prevents the
update traversal from working.
But
On 02/12/15 11:02, Steven Hardy wrote:
So, chatting with Giulio today about
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1521944
has be thinking about $subject.
The root case of that issue is essentially a corner case of a stack-update,
combined with some coupling within the Neutron API which prevents
