Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Others have already answered most of your questions in this thread, > but since nobody from the VMT has chimed in yet I'll just state on > our behalf that we're generally happy to consult privately or > publicly on any suspected vulnerability report wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-01-17 13:26:02 +0100 (+0100), Julien Danjou wrote: > I've asked on #openstack-security without success, so let me try here > insteead: > > We, Telemetry, have a security bug and we're not managed by VMT, any > hint as how to handle our bug? Or how to get covered by VMT? 😊 Others have alre

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Or, perhaps the last time people complained that the process > documentation was too detailed and the telemetry project decided it > didn't want to have to follow it? If that's the case, following the > embargoed procedures might not be what you want as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Adam Heczko wrote: > >> Hi Julien, I think that you should follow this [1] workflow. >> >> TL;DR: Pls make sure that if the bug is serious make it private on LP so >> that only core team members can access it and propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Rob C wrote: > Ian has provided advice on how you might become security managed, which > is a good aspiration for any team to have. > > However, if you have a serious security issue that you need help mitigating > the security project can help. We can work with you on the solu

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Adam Heczko wrote: > Hi Julien, I think that you should follow this [1] workflow. > > TL;DR: Pls make sure that if the bug is serious make it private on LP so > that only core team members can access it and propose patches. Please do > not send patches to Gerrit review queue b

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Rob C
You've done the right thing by posting here with the [Security] tag. Ian has provided advice on how you might become security managed, which is a good aspiration for any team to have. However, if you have a serious security issue that you need help mitigating the security project can help. We can

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Heczko
Hi Julien, I think that you should follow this [1] workflow. TL;DR: Pls make sure that if the bug is serious make it private on LP so that only core team members can access it and propose patches. Please do not send patches to Gerrit review queue but rather attach it to LP bug ticket and discuss t

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've asked on #openstack-security without success, so let me try here > insteead: > > We, Telemetry, have a security bug and we're not managed by VMT, any > hint as how to handle our bug? Or how to get covered by VMT? 😊 So, in terms

[openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi, I've asked on #openstack-security without success, so let me try here insteead: We, Telemetry, have a security bug and we're not managed by VMT, any hint as how to handle our bug? Or how to get covered by VMT? 😊 Cheers, -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info