Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Adam Young
On 09/26/2015 11:19 PM, RunnerCheng wrote: Hi All, I'm a newbie of keystone, and I'm doing some research about it recently. I have a question about how to deploy it. The scenario is on below: One comany has one headquarter dc and 5 sub dc locate in different cities. We want to deploy

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. Yep, this ^ -jay ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Matt Fischer
Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Curtis wrote: > Hi, > > For organizations with the keystone database shared across regions via >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
CERN do the same…. The memcache functions on keystone are very useful for scaling it up. Tim From: Matt Fischer [mailto:m...@mattfischer.com] Sent: 28 September 2015 18:51 To: Curtis Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org; Jonathan Proulx

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Curtis
OK thanks for the input everyone, much appreciated. Thanks, Curtis. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: >> >> Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & >> Designate, and a regional cluster

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
There seems to be a lot of overlap with the user survey which has just finished. Feel free to get in touch on the user-commit...@lists.openstack.org if you have questions to suggest to the survey or would like specific queries to be run on the anonymised data. There is a significant risk of

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-neutron with vsphere

2015-09-28 Thread Miko Bello
Thanks all for your contribution on my request. I already knew VIO ( previous version 1.0 ) but i just wanted to see what I could (or could not) do without NSX . Miko ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

Re: [Openstack-operators] Live snapshots on the raw disks never ends

2015-09-28 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ours was local-disk, I believe https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208078/ (and/or its followup bug/fix) will hopefully help address this. It might not be the same issue though (but maybe it is). -Josh Kris G. Lindgren wrote: I believe I was talking to Josh Harlow (he's harlowja in

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi all, As you may know, we've got 2 APIs in Cinder: v1 and v2. Cinder v2 API was introduced in Grizzly and v1 API is deprecated since Juno. After [1] is merged, Cinder API v1 is disabled in gates by default. We've got a filed bug [2] to remove Cinder v1 API at all. According to Deprecation

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops] First contribution

2015-09-28 Thread David Wahlstrom
Thanks for the warm invite. Hopefully my experience at Dreamhost/DreamCompute will provide useful to this team! On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, JJ Asghar wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hey everyone! > > I wanted to point out that we have had

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Kruithof, Piet
Hi Tim, Thanks for addressing some of the potential challenges around conducting surveys on behalf of the community. The research conducted by the OpenStack UX project, including surveys, tend to focus on specific project needs rather than the overall direction of the industry, which is captured

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Sam Morrison
Yeah we’re still using v1 as the clients that are packaged with most distros don’t support v2 easily. Eg. with Ubuntu Trusty they have version 1.1.1, I just updated our “volume” endpoint to point to v2 (we have a volumev2 endpoint too) and the client breaks. $ cinder list ERROR: OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Jonathan Proulx
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:31:54PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: :On 09/26/2015 11:19 PM, RunnerCheng wrote: :>Hi All, :>I'm a newbie of keystone, and I'm doing some research about it :>recently. I have a question about how to deploy it. The scenario is :>on below: :> :>One comany has one headquarter

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Voelker
FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36 respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), DeltaCloud (which has been retired by Apache and hasn’t seen a commit in two

[Openstack-operators] [neutron] [nova] Nova Network/Neutron Migration Survey - need response from folks currently using Nova Networks in their deployments

2015-09-28 Thread Kruithof, Piet
There has been a significant response to the Nova Network/Neutron migration survey. However, the responses are leaning heavily on the side of deployments currently using Neutron. As a result, we would like to have more representation from folks currently using Nova Networks. If you are